Search Results

Women's rights to their own sports teams are being overridden by the gender lobby. Let's look at Rugby in Ireland to understand why. The gender industry, as is becoming abundantly clear, is a part of the techno-medical-industrial complex, and its only relation to the human rights of LGB people is to use the LGB civil rights framework and political infrastructure to obscure its dirty work, providing a human rights veneer to a dangerous, profiteering, and social engineering agenda. AbbVie is a major Bio-pharmaceutical corporation intersecting with Rugby, Football, and the medical attack on human sex. More about them in a moment. Ireland is home to TENI (Transgender Equality Network Ireland). Founded in 2005, TENI, and ILGA (International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex Association), are two of the most prominent "transgender" organizations in Europe and Central Asia. TENI, With ILGA, represents over 800 organizations and groups across the region, working to normalize dissociation from the sexed body as identity and drive the idea globally that we are not a sexually dimorphic species. ILGA credited TENI for their work with policymakers and said TENI “reminds them of the scaffolding you see when a house is being built. It’s not the finished product, but it is work that will provide a structure for future activities, work that is designed to have long-lasting positive effects.” This apparatus to drive "transgenderism" globally functions similarly to Arcus Foundation in the US, a behemoth LGBT non-governmental organization founded by a medical corporation heir, worth billions. It's not surprising they mirror Arcus Foundation. TENI is funded by Astraea Foundation. This purported lesbian organization went from supporting lesbians to driving gender ideology after millions of dollars in grants from the Arcus Foundation. TENI does ongoing outreach and training with policymakers, healthcare professionals, and teachers in the concepts of gender ideology. TENI forms working relationships with the Health Service Executive (HSE – Ireland’s health service), school executive boards, researchers, and other key people and organizations that drive the normalization of gender ideology. Though no medical or scientific evidence of “gender” exists, TENI offers guidelines for general practitioners (GPs). TENI also partners with HSE to deliver Gender Identity Skills Training (GIST). GIST training is offered to all healthcare providers in all regions of the Republic of Ireland. TENI also provides training for staff in 47 post-primary schools and 17 primary schools in the Republic of Ireland. TENI plans for 2020-2023 are to further the trans agenda. Ireland is also the home of Irish Rugby, the Irish Rugby Football Union, which allows men to play as women if they perceive themselves as female, and Gaelic Football, a game played between teams of 15 players on a rectangular grass pitch. Gaelic football is one of four sports (collectively referred to as the "Gaelic games") controlled by the Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA), the largest sporting organization in Ireland. Under the auspices of the GAA, Gaelic football is a male-only sport; however, the related sport of ladies' Gaelic football is governed by the Ladies Gaelic Football Association. Outside Ireland, football is mainly played among members of the Irish diaspora. Gaelic Park in New York City is the largest purpose-built Gaelic sports venue outside Ireland. Though not very profitable for managers, players, or coaches, who are prohibited from profiting from the sport, that doesn’t stop Big Pharma from profiting from injuries. The current Irish healthcare system is primarily a tax-financed public system. Still, with significant out-of-pocket spending, mainly in primary care, and with supplementary health insurance for private hospital cover, it has a 45% rate of public participation. Roughly 20 years ago, Ireland had about 50 biopharma companies dotted throughout the country. Recent numbers put that figure at more than 300 companies. 19 of the top 20 global pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies are based in Ireland for a good reason. By establishing its manufacturing there, this industry has excellent geographical proximity to the mainland European markets. Easy international shipping across the Atlantic benefits pharmaceutical exports to North America. Five of the world’s eight top-selling drugs are produced in Ireland, making it the world’s largest net exporter of pharmaceuticals and a globally recognized center of excellence in Pharma. One of those companies is AbbVie, makers of the puberty blocker Lupron, pain medications, testosterone (andro gel), antibiotics for infections, and immunosuppressants to avoid rejection in transplant victims. All these drugs are used in surgeries being performed in the manipulation of people’s second sex characteristics. Puberty blockers are being used on the healthy bodies of children, treating puberty itself as a disease, all in the name of some indiscernible ideology being instituted globally that doesn't make an ounce of rational sense. AbbVie has also expressed a firm commitment to equality, diversity, and inclusion (ED&I) practices (which is gender-lobby-speak for driving body dissociation), both inside and outside the organization. AbbVie has created a unique sporting partnership with Ireland’s Gaelic Football team. It is the only sponsorship in Ireland between a multinational pharmaceutical company and a lady's or men’s inter-county Gaelic football team. Sligo Ladies Gaelic Football Association (LGFA) and AbbVie recently announced a three-year sponsorship at the company’s Manorhamilton Road facility in Sligo. The arrangement will see the AbbVie logo on the senior ladies’ football team jerseys until the end of 2022. AbbVie also sponsors the Sligo men’s county GAA Senior, U-21, and Junior football team jerseys. Many of the company’s 400-plus Sligo employees are involved in GAA and the LGFA or have previously played the sport at various levels. Johnson & Johnson, the largest biotech company in the world, has also found a home in Ireland and is a significant contributor to the gender industry. Pfizer, joined by Merck, Sanofi, ViiV, Gilead, Allegan, Bayer, Abbott, and many more biopharmaceutical corporations, call Ireland home, and support the gender industry, via inclusive policies, donations for research, and pharmaceutical developments. AbbVie has also found a market in the sports nutrition industry, like many other Pharma corporations serving the gender industry. The sports nutrition industry's global market value in 2019 was 15.6 billion dollars. The sector comprises protein bars, energy drinks, and various dietary supplements for athletes. It is hard to ignore the implications of these intersections and why the gender industry carries the day in the sports arena, from high school to universities and the Olympics. It is very profitable for the Pharma and tech industries to embrace the newly emerging gender industry and leave a wasteland of women’s rights to their sports in their wake. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

The 11th Hour Blog has had a facelift. In effort to keep much of the blog free-access, there will now be a feature that is for "paid supporters" that will provide even more of the journalism you've come to expect. Some of the posts coming to subscribers will be for supporters only ($5.00 monthly or $45.00 annually) and will have a paywall. Many of the posts will remain free-access. You are of course, free to continue making donations of any denomination. Know that all support and donations go toward research and writing about the intersections of Transgenderism, Technology and Capitalism. Exposing the money, power, pharmacology and technology behind the Trans Lobby is a massive undertaking because the political infrastructure and money driving the normalization of body dissociation are vast. Your support carries this work forward, and helps all those fighting this global corporate cult. Know that your efforts are appreciated and are creating real change in the dialogue of those resisting the gender identity industry, helping to arm resisters with the information they need to form new channels of discussion to open minds to what is really transpiring. Thank you and stay tuned for a riveting, new, supporter-access blog post about the intersection of Transgenderism, Big Pharma and the assault on women's sports!! Be prepared to be angered.

Of all the chaos and absurdity abounding around the transgender agenda, what seems probably most absurd (the medicalizing of healthy children’s bodies, aside), is the advent of men participating in women’s sporting events. From high school to professional sports and the Olympics, women are being overtaken by men who claim they are female. Women are getting hurt, and not just with lost opportunities. Less than a year ago, CBN News reported on the disastrous position of professional female Rugby players in the UK, getting injured on the playing field by men claiming to be female who had both players and referees leaving the game. In 2014, a man, Fallon Fox, claiming to be female, fractured his female opponent's skull in a mixed-martial-arts match within the first two minutes of the fight. What is patently absurd is that this is being allowed. Women’s sports are women’s sports for the very reason that men are inherently much stronger and larger physically, with more lung capacity and muscle mass. They can get more oxygen to their lungs and muscles. In the history of women’s sports, this has never been an issue. Suddenly it is. Why? Why are all professional sports organizations ignoring what is so obvious – that women are already being hurt by this, both professionally and physically and that it is bound to get worse? Women are collateral damage in a much bigger agenda than one that rolls back their rights. The gender agenda, parading around as a progressive movement for a marginalized population, is nothing but a bold-faced corporate, political coup that seeks to commercialize human biology. Driven by wealthy men with a sexual fetish that objectifies female biology for their erotic pleasure, it is being used to facilitate the dissociation of humanity from its roots in biological sex while screaming “freedom of expression” out of the other side of its mouth. I can just see your head shaking at how insane that sounds. But when we look at the money behind the gender lobby (I have, here and here), the ferocious speed with which this ideology entered western cultures and started rearranging them at every front to “include” and prioritize .03% of the population (at the time primarily adult men) with “body dysphoria,” it seems implausible at best that this is about human rights. These massive changes for .03% of the population are being made at the overt expense of 51% of the people that are female. Concurrently, technology is taking us, as a species, on a bullet-train ride toward humanities melding with AI. The Pharma and tech-controlled media are overriding any critique of this purported human rights movement - a movement poised to rake in enormous future profits for Pharma and tech. They are engaged in overt censorship regarding any critique of what this agenda is doing to society, children, and women’s rights. When we step back to look at the bigger picture, something much different than a human rights movement emerges. It also explains why most major corporations, banks, pharmaceutical, tech, and medical industries, along with politicians and governments, are all in for "trans." Why would they care about .03% of the population? What is the investment? Pharmaceutical corporations, along with others, support men identifying as women in sports because transgenderism has been strategically driven into our markets by LGBT NGOs with ties to Pharma and Tech, with an eye toward future developments in human biology. For these technological and pharmacological developments to humanity to be accepted, the ground must be cultivated. This cultivation transpires by deconstructing sexual dimorphism in humans via gender ideology. Men become the default human, and women are relegated to their use. I hesitate to say “become” because this is not new territory. Most religions and patriarchal cultures already function on this premise. But with the looming, gargantuan presence of tech and Pharma and the waning influence of religion, there is a vacuum into which the new tech gods are slipping. But let’s leave the future of Transgenderism and its goals on the back burner and concentrate on the intersections of sports, Pharma, and trans in the immediate realm. After all, I could be wrong. Maybe corporations, governments, medical giants, law firms, billionaires, and banks care deeply about the .03% of men who wish they were women at the expense of everyone and everything else and not their profit margins. Big Pharma and the medical-industrial complex intersect with both sports and transgenderism in significant ways. Annually, sports medicine is a 9.2 billion dollar enterprise. “Gender surgeries” on physically healthy people are projected to bring in annual revenues of 1.5 billion dollars by 2026 (which says nothing of the continued care for these people throughout their lives). Let’s go back to rugby. Rugby union and rugby league invest in popular contact sports, but they bring a high risk of injury (higher for women, now, with men in their games). Across multiple injury types, past participation in rugby union and rugby league, particularly at the elite level, is associated with a high cumulative injury load and a continued impact of previous injuries post-retirement. The biopharmaceutical corporation Astellas Pharma US Inc, an affiliate of Tokyo-based Astellas Pharma Inc, along with other giant pharmaceutical makers who support the trans lobby, such as Johnson and Johnson and Abbvie (makers of the puberty blocker Lupron), is a key player operating in the global visceral pain treatment market. Those recovering from surgeries as intense as the overhaul of secondary sex characteristics, and those suffering life-long sports injuries are the beneficiaries of these medications. Of course, others are as well. Astellas has also received bountiful praise from the Human Rights Council (Gender Lobby) for its LGBT protections for employees. In an exceedingly ironic twist, Astellas fights doping in the sports arena! In 2015, Astellas signed up as the title sponsor for the rugby Test match between USA and Australia at Chicago’s Soldier Field. Astellas is also involved in immunology, transplantation, and urology medications, all used in the medical attack on human sex posing as a human rights movement. In 2019, Astellas announced it would invest nearly $13 million into two innovation incubators operated by LabCentral, a premier US-based laboratory facility for next-generation biotech start-ups. This initiative, combined with the more than $1 billion Astellas had previously committed to driving innovation in Massachusetts, contributed to the Boston-area life science community's ongoing efforts to accelerate the discovery and development of potential breakthrough therapies, such as regenerative, cell, and gene therapies. Regenerative medicine seeks to replace tissue or organs damaged by disease, trauma, or congenital issues, vs. the current clinical strategy that focuses primarily on treating the symptoms. The tools used to realize these outcomes are tissue engineering, cellular therapies, artificial organs, and medical devices like those made by the 13-billion-dollar (Now 17.1 billion dollars) medical supply corporation, Stryker Medical. Stryker Corporation is owned by Jon Stryker, founder of the LGBT non-governmental organization, Arcus Foundation. Astellas is one Pharma giant. Rugby is one sport. But these intersections of sports medicine, “trans medicine,” and profit for the medical-industrial complex help us understand what is going on in the larger picture of the breached boundaries of women’s sports by men and why everyone is letting it slide. The protection of men claiming they are women, alongside feigned ignorance at the brutal injuries already occurring to women competing against men, the overt blind eye and media disrespect shown female Olympians Martina Navratilova, Sharron Davies, and Paula Radcliffe, calling out this madness, cannot be shrugged off. It is sheer madness and blatant abuse of women for the profit of Big Pharma and Big Tech. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this this link for donations. Thank you.

Two years after Laverne Cox, a man posing as a female on the cover of Time Magazine, ushered in what was referred to as the transgender tipping point, Stella Morabito, a journalist, blogger, and one-time intelligence analyst, wrote a remarkably prescient piece about the "transgender movement." The article “The Transgender Movement is a Vehicle for Censorship and State Power” jumped right over discussing “gender identity” and what being "transgender" means for any particular individual. Instead, it focused on the broader picture of what gender ideology means for society. Morabito stripped bare the notion that we were dealing with any kind of movement for the protection of .03% of the population and went straight to the crux of what was transpiring. The deconstruction of biological sex, being promoted by the gender lobby, didn’t escape Morabito as it did most people. But then, Morabito had been trained in propaganda and analyzing intelligence. The deconstruction of sexual dimorphism in humans, she explained, was written into every gender identity non-discrimination law. “It aims to legally erase male and female sex distinctions," she wrote. “In short,” she continued, “the 'transgender movement' is operating as a vehicle for conformity of thought. And in the end, that means it is a vehicle for dismantling freedom – in the name of freedom – and for building the power of the State.” We can now look back at the last six years and delineate what the power and censorship that Morabito referred to look like. Below is a sampling of how that tyranny in the guise of freedom is manifesting. Big Tech, with its extensive interest in future individuals constructed by tech and pharmacology, governs our media platforms, including social media. They are engaged in broad-scale social engineering that cultivates a social acceptance of body dissociation as progressive. By controlling the narrative around gender self-ID and what is being called "transgenderism," they easily sway public perceptions. By censoring those who do not conform, by driving punishing diatribes, social ostracization, and job loss for those who do manage to get alternate perspectives out, they can make people believe the unbelievable - or at least go along with it. Here is an earlier list of Trans censorship (I was unable to secure the author of this list): *A Master List of those Banned by Trans: https://bannedbytrans.wordpress.com/masterpost/ Here are some additions of Trans censorship from the past three years: *Two of the biggest Harry Potter fan sites removed photos of JK Rowling and links to her website because of her 'harmful and disproven beliefs' amid 'transphobia' row July 2020 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8486969/Harry-Potter-fan-sites-remove-photos-JK-Rowling-comments-amid-transphobia-row.html *Stella Perret a UK cartoonist and journalist was cancelled from the Morning Star for a purported "transphobic" cartoon, and given no leeway to respond to her mob of critics. July 2020 *Abigail Shrier's new book about the rapid onset gender dysphoria in teen girls was censored by Amazon. Amazon notified her publisher they would not allow for advertisements of the book on their platform - June 2020 https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-enforces-trans-orthodoxy-11592865818 *Best-selling children's author Gillian Phillip was fired after adding the hashtag 'I stand with JK Rowling' to her Twitter handle amid bitter row over transgender rights June 2020 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8490821/Best-selling-childrens-author-sacked-posting-hashtag-stand-JK-Rowling-Twitter.html *CNN -Graham Linehan, creator of 'The IT Crowd' and 'Father Ted,' was removed from Twitter June 2020 https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/27/entertainment/graham-linehan-twitter-removal-trnd/index.html *REDDIT canceled GenderCritical, Gender_Critical, the Rowling support sub, etc., yet left up rape, pedophilia, incest, racism and other women-hating subs. Good analysis with list of horrific subs REDDIT left up by THE STATE MEDIA - June 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2uFXcW31BQ *Don't call us menstruators' petition was taken down by change.org - June 2020 https://thepostmillennial.com/dont-call-us-menstruators-petition-censored-by-change-org *RESOURCE! - the REDDIT sub keeping track of Gender Movement censorship, cancelling of feminists/ feminist events, was closed due to REDDIT purging of feminists - 2020 https://www.reddit.com/r/cance11ed/ *Twitter permanently suspended feminist, journalist Meghan Murphy's account in late November 2018, after she referred to a trans woman as "him". In February 2019, Murphy filed a lawsuit against Twitter in response to her banning, which she ultimately lost. *4th Wave Now is still locked out of twitter even after journalist Jesse Singal got twitter support to admit it made a mistake - Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/BJontry/status/1206719899298492416 *F-Droid Banned Feminist Social Media Site, Spinster, Then Banned Female Dev for Asking Questions. Admin Marcus Hoffman stated, "We will not have the feminism discussion here.” - Dec 2019 https://4w.pub/f-droid-bans-feminist-social-media-site-spinster-then-bans-people-asking-questions/ *NPR -YouTube said it will now remove videos and comments that threaten or intimidate people based on their race, gender expression or sexual orientation — a response to criticism of its anti-harassment policies - Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/NPR/status/1204908986367139840 *Scotland - SNP transgender activists dug up “dirt” on MPs who support women’s sex-based rights - Dec 2019 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/snp-members-victims-of-lgbt-campaign-dl5pbc2mk *UK -Tory women created pledge in support of women’s sex-based rights, Twitter deboosted them - Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/CUPWomensPledge/status/1201158489059540992 *An Edinburgh University event discussing how gender issues are taught in Scotland's schools was cancelled amid claims that the safety of women speakers and attendees was at risk. The research seminar on schools and gender diversity, organized by the university's Institute for Education, Teaching and Leadership, was due to be held the following week, but despite plans for increased security staff, the event was postponed. - Dec 2019 https://www.scotsman.com/education/scottish-schools-transgender-event-cancelled-amid-fears-for-speakers-safety-1-5055656 *Yet Edinburgh University allowed many trans events - Dec 2019 https://twitter.com/ForwomenScot/status/1201786381472817152 *Famous Artist and feminist was deplatformed by human rights/trans activist, Communication Manager, at the Cherie Booth Foundation - Nov 2019 https://twitter.com/rachelara/status/1198329912920330240 *Singer Ellie Goulding threatened to quit halftime show because it supported Salvation Army and SA has a history of LGBTQ discrimination - Nov 2019 https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2019/11/singer-ellie-goulding-threatens-quit-nfl-halftime-show-supports-salvation-army/#.XcxL6otaR-s.twitter *FiLiA women’s rights conference censored by Facebook - Oct 2019 https://twitter.com/FiLiA_charity/status/1184804787163992064 *UK Gender warriors tried to get Piers Morgan fired for offensive comments - Oct 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7570043/Piers-Morgan-laughs-face-petition-sacked-transgender-100-identities-comments.html *UK Thames Valley police asked public for help in stopping crime wave of people putting up “offensive” stickers with the definition of “woman adult human female” and “women don’t have penises” - Oct 2019 https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/10/a-transphobic-crime-wave-has-hit-oxford/ *Britain's first children's gender identity clinic hired lawyers to 'silence' book publishers who warned the rocketing number of youngsters seeking to change sex is 'becoming a scandal' The book is called Inventing Transgender Children and Young People Lawyers claim many who contributed may have broken NHS confidentiality rules It requested that they send a copy of the book to the clinic prior to publication - Oct 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7566851/Britains-childrens-gender-identity-clinic-hired-lawyers-silence-critics-new-book.html?ito=amp_twitter_share-top *Deep Green Resistance environmentalists Denver meeting deplatformed because of trans-critical Derrick Jensen and rad fem Lierre Kieth because DGR voted to keep a women’s space for women - Sept 2019 https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCritical/comments/d9c63j/another_day_another_deplatforming_jensen_and_keith/ *UK women’s panel on transgenderism was shut down by trans activist threats - proceeds were to go to charity - Sept 2019 https://twitter.com/SoniaPoulton/status/1173531391600005120 *Individual identifying as trans sued UK TIMES claiming an atmosphere hostile to "trans" people, and by extension, him. He also claimed misogyny. If the individual wins, it might change the way UK newsrooms can cover people identifying as "transgender" and minorities https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/times-sued-transphobic-bullying-former-editor- August 2019 (“His call for change came just months after the Independent Press Standards Organization, the newspaper regulator, launched a review into how newspapers report on "trans" issues, and after 5,000 people signed a petition calling for a separate public inquiry into "transphobic" coverage by the press). *Journalists at the Guardian US publicly condemned its UK coverage of "trans" stories - June 2019, US staff published a stinging response to the editorial that pitted women’s rights against "transgender" rights, disavowing the “transphobic”, “misplaced”, and “misguided” stance taken by the London office that “highlighted for us an alarming intolerance of "trans"viewpoints”. https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwick/times-sued-transphobic-bullying-former-editor *Two "trans" employees quit GUARDIAN over its reporting on "trans" issues - August 2019 https://www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/patrickstrudwick/two-transgender-employees-quit-guardian-transphobia?__twitter_impression=true *Leeds paper lied about how lesbians chanted down at 2019 PRIDE - Aug 2019 https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/watch-leeds-pride-supporters-drown-16701511 *Alison Moyet was hounded off of twitter -July 2019 https://www.spiked-online.com/2018/07/10/trans-activism-is-now-just-misogyny-in-drag/ *Southern Poverty Law Center tried to tie gender critical women protesting Drag Queen Story Hour to White Nationalism - June 2019 https://pjmedia.com/trending/splc-strains-to-tie-white-nationalists-to-critics-of-trans-activism-drag-queen-story-hour/ *Thousands of University of British Columbia staff via their union (same union Association of Administrative and Professional Staff headed by Morgane Oger’s friend who protested appearance of Jenn Smith, a male claiming a "transgender" identity, fighting SOGI 123 in Canada) - June 2019 https://www.citynews1130.com/2019/06/20/thousands-ubc-staff-cancellation-anti-sogi-event/#.XQzmSBxccwM.twitter *Group of Oxford academics sent an open letter regarding Stonewall’s antiscientific training at the universities - June 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7146961/Leading-Oxford-academics-blast-LGBT-charity-Stonewalls-trans-awareness-training.html *UK journalist, Janice Turner was attacked as transphobic by Guardian, Independent, BBC for asking question to NSPCC about Bergdorf and safeguarding - June 2019 https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/06/munroe-bergdorfs-sacking-and-the-failure-of-the-media/ *Famous West Hollywood gay bar The Abbey forced to apologize for staffers "transphobia" - June 2019 https://www.wehoville.com/2019/06/07/the-abbey-concedes-and-apologizes-as-a-transgender-employee-claims-a-staffer-insulted-trans-people/ *Petition site CARE2 removed Arlington parents petition asking for more time before Transgender Lobby changes are made - June 2019 https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/07/arlington-public-school-parents-deplatformed-over-petition-to-pause-new-transgender-policy/ *Edinburgh University LGBT network resigned en masse because gender critical feminist Julie Bindel was allowed to speak - June 2019 https://www.news4jax.com/news/georgia/glynn-county/brunswick/police-man-accused-of-attacking-11-year-old-girl-in-sonnys-bathroom_ *UK Bristol University voted to no-platform TERFS 2018 https://thetab.com/uk/bristol/2018/03/02/bristol-students-vote-to-no-platform-trans-exclusionary-feminists-in-heated-annual-members-meeting-32655 *IPSO (press standards org in UK) to study UK press coverage of "transgenderism" (sounds like in favor of "transgenderism") - May 2019 https://www.ipso.co.uk/news-press-releases/blog/ipso-blog-examining-editorial-standards-in-coverage-of-transgender-issues/ *Graham Linehan’s commentary was deleted by MEDIUM - May 2019 https://www.peaktrans.org/graham-linehan/ *Twitter is BANNING women who 'speak out against trans ideology. Feminists claim Fair Play for Women claim Twitter is banning them for their viewpoints. They claim they are being prevented from speaking out against trans ideology Accounts were 'banned' for saying men have penises and men aren't women The group called on Twitter board member Martha Lane Fox to help their cause Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5787903/Twitter-BANNING-women-speak-against-trans-ideology-feminists-claim.html#ixzz5H0sVNkUr *Posie Parker and Caroline Farrow accused by Greens - March 2019 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/03/20/second-woman-investigated-police-transphobic-comments/ *Farrow https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/03the-journalist-investigated-by-police-for-using-the-wrong-pronouns/ *For Women Scotland pamphlets called hate crimes - March 19 https://pinksaltire.com/2019/03/20/anti-trans-leaflets-found-at-edinburgh-council-hq/ *"Trans" group tries to ban Jenni Murry from literary festival UK – March 2019 https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/trans-groups-demand-leeds-lit-festival-ban-bbc-presenter-from-speaking-in-transphobia-row-1-9636841 https://twitter.com/LeedsNews/status/1103693405824212992 *Open University in UK cancelled conference on prison reform due to trans threats - March 2019 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2019/03/20/open-university-forced-cancel-conference-following-threats-transgender/ *Mumsnet/ Linehan peak trans thread – February 2019 https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3518546-help-a-brother-out *TRAs tried to deplatform the psychologist who wrote about Littman study - 2018 https://quillette.com/2018/12/09/a-surfeit-of-empathy-and-an-absence-of-compassion/ *Graham Linehan was given harassment warning over “transphobia" - October 2018 https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/tv-radio-web/graham-linehan-given-harassment-warning-after-transphobia-report-1.3654626 *Bafta award-winning creator of Father Ted reported to police in online row with transgender activist. Father Ted creator Graham Linehan embroiled in row with transgender lawyer Activist Stephanie Hayden, who allegedly tweeted his wife's personal details online TV show writer calls self-described 'social democrat' Hayden 'a dangerous troll' Linehan reported to the police for 'transphobic harassment' after allegedly sharing a post online containing Hayden’s alliases – September 2018 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6222135/Bafta-award-winning-creator-Father-Ted-reported-police-online-row-transgender-activist.html Video of Hayden as a man getting angry https://twitter.com/lunarfish1524/status/1097987291015008256 *Journalist, Jesse Singal, who wrote about trans kids for the ATLANTIC, has been hounded by Trans identified male, Dawn Ennis/ HRC - June 2018 https://medium.com/@lifeafterdawn/we-warned-the-atlantic-about-jesse-singal-but-they-ignored-us-beaee469d3f8 *Twitter 'banned women against trans ideology', say feminists - May 2018 BBC https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44288431 *Laverne Cox, a male who identifies as female vs very famous Nigerian novelist/ activist Chimamanda Adichie, who got hounded for saying that trans”women” have different life experiences than women -March 2017 https://www.themarysue.com/laverne-cox-on-male-privilege/ https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/news/chimamanda-ngozi-adichie-transgender-women-channel-four-a7625481.html *Identity is the issue of our age: so why can’t we talk more honestly about “trans women?” - 2017 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/18/identity-issue-our-age-talk-more-honestly-trans-women *Hypatia/ Tuval trans-racialism - Controversy Updates (updated) – June 2017 http://dailynous.com/2017/05/09/hypatia-controversy-updates/ Censorship *Birth coach is 'hounded out' of industry charity Doula UK after transgender activists brand her Facebook message claiming only women can have babies as offensive - November 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7643251/Charity-hounds-birth-coach-post-saying-women-children.html *Glasgow women’s library https://twitter.com/womenslibrary/status/1098880002987380738 *Janice Turner (UK journalist for THE TIMES) has to fight IPSO - April 2019 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1121392130021363713.html https://twitter.com/VictoriaPeckham/status/1121392130021363713 *Miranda Yardley hate crime lawsuit – March 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6764763/Britains-transgender-hate-crime-trial-halted-one-day.html *James Caspian’s detransition study blocked by Bath Spa University. February 2019 https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/02/22/my-battle-with-the-transgender-thoughtpolice/ *Little Brown publishers had to change james Barry biography The Cape Doctor - February 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/littlebrown/status/1100453326431416321 *Rebecca Tuvel - author of controversial philosophy paper on trans-racial and transgender Speech in academic philosophy: Rebecca Tuvel on Rachel Dolezal. Paper redacted – June 2017 https://notesonliberty.com/2017/05/03/speech-in-academic-philosophy-rebecca-tuvel-on-rachel-dolezal/ http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/05/transracialism-article-controversy.html#comments This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

On Saturday, August 8th, I participated in and listened to a live, day-long, online conference critiquing the gender self-ID movement. A vast array of speakers from around the world gathered to critique changes to laws, censorship, medical malpractice, the mutilation of language, destruction of young, healthy bodies, men in women’s sports and safe spaces, and the absolute lunacy of an ideology that purports that men can be women. It was an extraordinary event, organized with intelligent technology creating a seamless stream of speaker-to-speaker presentations and open chat rooms where participants and speakers alike could mingle and discuss the talks before, during, and after each presentation. Listening to a mom speak about losing not one but two of her children to the trans cult nearly undid me. It was late. I’d been watching excellent speeches all day, and I was getting tired. The waver in this mom’s robust and courageous voice is what threatened the undoing. It was just two short skips - before she resumed her composure. One skip in her composure came at the end of a story about a friend, another mom, who had lost her daughter to the trans cult. Her friend was holed-up in a hotel room praying and crying, under a table, on the night before her teen daughter’s surgery to have her healthy breasts amputated – an act this young woman's mother could not legally prevent. The second waver in her voice came when she shared her story of losing her two children to this corporate-driven medical cult. This is happening to so many families who have no recourse because our institutions have been bought off. The other thing that announced itself like a gong going off were the voices of young women caught in the maw of the medical industry, which attacked their sex wantonly; my heart and respect go out to these women who exhibit courage in spades - sharing their stories of the medical malpractice that has changed their lives. It wasn’t their stories that hit me the hardest, though harrowing as they were to hear. It was the timbre of their voices - the way testosterone (wrong sex hormones) had changed their voices permanently – a forever reminder every time they opened their mouths to speak about what was done to them. And make no mistake, this was done to them. Another courageous and informative speaker, Dr. Van Meter, a pediatric endocrinologist, brooked no nonsense in discussing the dangers of medicalizing young people’s identities, halting puberty, and giving young people wrong sex hormones. It was startling listening to him discuss his profession and how most doctors are too busy to research information about new developments in care and rely on other experts sending around guidelines. When asked about where these guidelines were coming from regarding the care of children and adolescents seeking treatment for what is being called gender dysphoria, his response was quick and penetrating: Activists. As I have written elsewhere, the giant LGBT NGOs have stopped advocating for the rights of same-sex attracted individuals and have taken up the promotion of Trans and gender identity. There is profit in medicalizing sexuality and tying it to our identity. Arcus Foundation, one of the most prominent LGBT NGOs in the world, deploys millions of philanthropic dollars each year to filter gender identity and transgender ideology into American law and institutions. Arcus was founded in 2000 by Jon Stryker, heir to a medical corporation fortune. Arcus Foundation has sent hundreds of thousands of dollars annually to the American Psychological Foundation (APA). The APA is the leading scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States, with more than 118,000 members. In 2009 the APA established a Gender Identity and Gender Variance Task Force and two years later started receiving bountiful funds from Arcus Foundation ($150,000. In 2011) to combat Gender Identity as a mental illness. By 2013 the Arcus Grant was increased to $300,000. for three years of support to increase the capacity of psychology organizations and the gender identity movement to use psychiatric knowledge in education, media relations, and policy change. Having conquered North America, Arcus Foundation grants explicitly turned toward establishing its foothold of activism in the global south. The money continued to flow to the APA and the National Science Foundation from Arcus Foundation coffers and continues to drive a science-denying ideology into the minds of children as young as three. Parents need to understand the money and political apparatus creating activists and medical guidelines for the medical professionals playing out these political objectives on their children’s bodies. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

Elon Musk has an update about an update, coming in August, as reported by cnet this month. The “progress” update on Neuralink is about his startup trying to create a link between brains and computers. – the one he sees as an existential threat to humanity. The device aims to help those with brain and spinal cord injuries or congenital defects. But the long-term goal is to build a "digital superintelligence layer" to link humans with artificial intelligence. In July 2019, Musk said the company had tried the device on a monkey, and the monkey had been able to control a computer with its brain. He also said he'd hoped to have it in a human patient by the end of the year. Knowing my penchant for marking the connections between transgenderism, transhumanism, technology, and capitalism, someone asked me this morning what I think of this. How could something so unique for people with spinal cord injuries be wrong (I believe transhumanism is terrible)? No one ever thinks of this type of progress as wrong. I mean, who can argue with helping injured people? I think we should ask the monkey what it thinks. Let’s ask the monkey Musk minions tried this on, shall we? - or the several hundred which he probably used who didn’t have spinal cord injuries, who were taken from their home in the wild, stuck in a laboratory in some cage, away from their land base and family so Musk could experiment - all for us amazing, superior humans who get to use and abuse anything or anyone in our path as long as we’re doing it for “progress.” This is the first thing that comes to my mind - and of course, it happens everywhere daily all over the world to rats and mice and monkeys and rabbits and the pigs being raised on Martine Rothblatt’s xenotransplantation farm who will become heart and lung donors so humans can live indefinitely - or at least a whole lot longer. We don’t hear the screams, so no big deal. The second issue I have with this is all the natural “resources,” or destruction of the natural world that goes into the tech that creates this “progress.” It seems a wee bit counter-productive to my mind. It’s not that there is no thought about this as the icebergs continue their slip into the long night, but that tech speeds ahead of us while we’re still in conversation mode – and by “we,” I mean the uber-rich. The 99% don’t get a vote. And lastly, the risk posed by transhumanism may seem worth it unless we consider the path we’re already on. Our high-speed transportation modes bring exciting opportunities and first-hand knowledge of other cultures. They also separate us from the living communities, our land, and the people we were born to and around. They create distance in terms of time and space but also a distance from the same forms of knowledge that emerge for each family member from their particular land bases and their connectedness to each other. We may visit our families on those high speeds of transportation to get back once a year, but who will they have become to us? Will we know them as we would have, had we lived and grown amongst them? Would our relationships have proved more rooted, durable, and enriching? How about our smartphones? How about our computers, our tablets, our wrist widgets, and TikTok? They bring so much! They are incredible!! How did we live without them? What are they doing to our land base - our home? What are they doing to our relationships? Are we so much better off talking to each other through zoom and FaceTime? The problem with technology is we never get to ask. We never get to consider the damage. Our societies are too big and complex to ask these questions at each juncture. The speed at which technology develops and the sheer size of our complex cultures prohibits a democratic evaluation process along the lines of “should we or shouldn’t we?” and “what is the overall cost?” Add unfettered capitalism and stir. Corporatism doesn’t stop for anyone. It strives with the nearly life-like current of the market to create profit, like a heat-seeking missile. Nothing must get in its way. And those at the top, with all the money, are addicted to its flow. You can almost hear the technical heartbeat of the market each day upon awakening: progress, progress, progress, where once there was the magnificent pulse of the natural world surrounding us, enveloping us, connecting us through the currents of the planet's waterways, other species, our respective land base, and our communities. Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of spinal cord injuries. 102 people die each day from auto accidents. We create technologies that put us at risk for injuries we then make technologies to fix them. I don’t see a lot of sanity in this. I know a lot of harms get no restitution but proliferate outwards like incurable cancer, covering our world and all the species in it. The same thing happens with transgenderism. We create a tech fix for the steel boxes of cultural stereotypes and never ask for a moment if deconstructing the boxes that imprison our natural development would be better than the tech fix. Transgenderism is profitable. It deconstructs our humanity by deconstructing and commoditizing sex, the way capitalism deconstructs a way of life that would have us living in a community with the land and each other, chewing us all up for the market. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

As the rise in young women identifying as men soar in western cultures, young women are binding their breasts, having elective breast amputations and skin grafts to create fake penises, while ingesting synthetic hormones which mimic male hormones. This is being celebrated by Hollywood and the media as progressive. Abigail Shrier, in her new book, Irreversible Damage/The Transgender Craze Seducing our Daughters, reports some startling statistics. “Between 2016 and 2017, the number of gender surgeries for natal females in the United States quadrupled, with biological women suddenly accounting for—as we have seen—70 percent of all gender surgeries. In 2018, the UK reported a 4,400 percent rise over the previous decade in teenage girls seeking gender treatments.” This month’s issue of Sports Illustrated celebrates the normalization of body dissociation – which at its core is what the modern, corporate trans movement is all about – with a man striking a sexually objectifying pose on its cover. He is clad in a bathing suit and is hailed as the first “transwoman” to be shown on the cover. As Sports Illustrated is meant to appeal to the sexual appetite of the average American heterosexual male, they are selling men on the idea that men can be women. This is an ad campaign for dissociation from biological sex. Hollywood has been glamorizing trans since it hit the culture running in 2015, with former Olympian Bruce Jenner posing plumped and carved in a corset on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine, exemplifying the male fetishization of females. The accolades could be heard from one end of the country to the other. “Brave,” “beautiful,” “we love you, Caitlyn!” Whoopi Goldberg directs a “trans” modeling agency, Strut, on Oprah’s Oxygen network. TomBoyX, Luna Pads, and Thinx corporations have all used the amputations of young women's healthy breasts in their ad campaigns, normalizing body dissociation, and mutilations as self-expression, and self-empowerment, with no criticism in mainstream media. Transguy Supply is a new company supplying fashion to women who have medically altered their second-sex characteristics to identify as men. They provide binders, stand-up-to-pee devices, packers, “packer gear,” grooming aids, and quippy fashion apparel. Where will this reverence for, and the glamorization of, the mutilation of young people's sex lead us? Kids have been watching and getting the message – body dissociation is cool and glamorous. But it’s not just Hollywood and corporations sending it. Kids are getting the message from the industries profiting from their mutilated flesh that removing secondary sex characteristics is fashionable. Cosmetic Surgery Partners in the UK, one of the leading specialists in cosmetic surgery, have created top surgery T-shirts for young women voluntarily removing their breasts and attempting to identify out of being female. The shirts have printed scars, where the actual scar tissue would be present on their bodies. When confronted with this on Twitter by people outraged at the normalization of healthy breast removal made into fashion, the company responded that it started as a bit of “fun.” At our roots as humans, we are a sexually dimorphic species. Changing our biology to manifest some elusive “gender identity” is not self-expression but a deconstruction of what it means to be human. It is not like getting a nose job, or a tattoo, but chemically and surgically deconstructing sex. It is emerging as a profitable industry. MarketWatch, an American media platform tracking the market, predicts by 2026, surgeries attacking healthy human sex characteristics will reach profits of 1.5 billion dollars, with projected growth being 24.5%. Will young women still be the predominant consumers of this savagery? Behind the façade of this as progress lay the actual disruption of, or the future disruption of, healthy body processes, such as puberty, myriad health complications, the ability to have children, and a life-long attachment to the medical-industrial complex. It is high time we asked where all this is going. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

For the uninitiated to the money and power behind the transgender lobby, the JK Rowling media melee can look like the wokerati at work again, the aggrieved social justice warriors of the left, with another victim in their maw. UK journalist, Douglas Murray exhibits just this blind spot in his article, this morning. In UnHerd. JK Rowling has certainly roiled the woke-beards of the left if Glenn Greenwald’s comments on Twitter last night are any indicator, his entrenchment in identity politics on full display (do only the marginalized get to speak Glenn?), but JK Rowling has done more than shine a bright light on call-out culture and their mob rule tactics, simply for having a differing opinion. She has done more than inflamed the misogynists hiding behind identity politics, in what has become a shrieking tower of babel for the left. JK Rowling as has been shown, by the terrified and abusive reaction of our Big Pharma controlled media conglomerates, that she is not to be trifled with. She has not only addressed the issue of women’s rights being decimated under the capitalist coup of the gender identity industry, but she has also laid bare the eugenics experiment being conducted against mostly gay children. Whoa! She really went there. Good for her. Someone had to say it. Someone with a platform. Someone too big for them to cancel. This is the real drama playing out here. How will they get JK Rowling back in the bag now that she has gotten out? JK Rowling must be silenced, vilified, trampled, disgraced, and humiliated if Pharma is going to continue to get away with this tragic coup of fomenting a new industry out of our sexed bodies. Medical identities have gone from being a disorder to being lauded as brave and beautiful. Every major corporation is on board for the framing of body dissociation as profit. This is not an issue of everyone being free to express themselves. This is not gender non-conformity or gender-bending of generations past. This is identity medicine; sexual identities mined for profit by the corporate state. The state has already colonized sexual orientation and has now moved on to embodied sex itself. Hence the addition of a fetish added to the LGB. Identity medicine is a terrible idea in total. Signaling the opposite sex publicly (not in dress but body parts – aided by the medical-industrial complex) objectifies & makes a commodity of our sexed being. It fetishizes our sexed bodies & normalizes this for others, especially children. Though JK Rowling didn’t say this straight up, she might as well have. She has exposed the eugenics being played out against gay people and on the bodies of young gender non-conforming children. What will they do with a woman who dares to use her enormous platform to tell the truth, not with a bullhorn, but with grace, power, and dignity, in the face of a vitriolic mob? It is becoming obvious she is not going away. The more they rage against her, the more they expose themselves and their tyranny. Stand tall, JK Rowling. Many of us are standing with you. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

Who profits from an agenda, being framed as a human rights issue, which catapults a rise in surgeries to mask sex? Because the medical industry is attacking human sex with drugs and surgeries, framing it as a human rights issue, most people miss the growing industry evolving in body dissociation – creating a new market in synthetic sexes. Our genes, DNA, and sex characteristics are being farmed for profit. The rebranding of transsexualism to "transgenderism" and its promotion as healthy human progression commodifies our sexed humanity, reducing our wholeness to parts. Sex, specifically female sex, has already been exploited by corporations through the industries of pornography, prostitution, and commercial surrogacy. But the colonization of our sexed humanity, via the illusion of being able to change sex, goes further. Corporate profits being generated and rising over the years for sex surgeries on physically healthy individuals give light to why media and corporations drive the concept of gender identity and have rebranded a sexual fetish of adult men in a way that has made it attractive to young people as an identity. It also helps us understand why the most prominent international law firm in the world is helping to construct the legal lie of the “transgender child,” an identity that creates life-long medical patients. Governments, corporations, and banks don’t generally support grassroots movements to advance social justice unless there is something in it for them. Social justice movements usually form against governments, corporations, and banks because they are predatory entities, not generally concerned with the common good of men and women. We don’t have to wonder why so many governments, banks, and corporations have taken such a keen interest in a tiny marginalized group of men with a fetish. This fetish is an objectification of women, with the fetishist obsessively imagining themselves as female with female sex characteristics – or dismembered parts. The answer is industry. Examining a bare-bones trajectory of how it kicked off, along with statistics for profit, tells us what we need to know. Trajectory: In 1992 several transsexuals, including Martine Rothblatt, a significant character in the development of a fetish into an industry with a penchant for AI, created a document to legally and linguistically deconstruct human sexual dimorphism and to manufacture sexual identities that would generate profit for the medical-industrial complex (MIC) which he then invested in. In 1994, a gay man, Tim Gill, left his computer software (Quark) corporation behind to create an American behemoth LGBT NGO, the Gill Foundation. His foundation set out to tie what was then only an entity serving the rights of same-sex attracted people to our legal and political structures. Later "transgenderism" was added to LGB. Gill has also invested in AI. In 1999, Jon Stryker, a banker and heir to an American multi-billion-dollar medical corporation, created Arcus Foundation, an LGBT NGO he funds with stock from his medical corporation. This corporation develops medical supplies and instruments, including those using AI technology. The profits from these newly formed medical identities then serve his medical corporation. He has proceeded to drive "transgenderism" through all our political, cultural, and civic institutions, as well as the market. Gill and Stryker are friends. Stryker's sister works with Gill. In 2013 Jennifer Pritzker, a retired, divorced army colonel in his 60s and member of one of the wealthiest families in the US, decided he was a woman. He and his family have enormous power and investments in the MIC, which they used to influence the normalization of "transgenderism" – dissociation from our sexed human bodies. Statistics on Profit: 2000-2014 the number of sex surgeries on physically healthy people rose fourfold. 2015-2016 the number of sex surgeries on physically healthy people increased by 19%. 2020-2026 projected growth of sex surgeries on physically fit people will be 24.5%, with global profits in sex surgeries on physically healthy people projected to be 1.5 billion dollars. MarketWatch assesses that the growth in sex surgeries on physically healthy people can be attributed to the progression of technology and medicines. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

Where are the Nullos in the mythology of gender identity, and why have they escaped media attention? So far, no Hollywood star has “come out” as Nullo, nor announced the happy occasion of their Nullo son’s “transition.” No brave and stunning magazine covers, no reality shows, and no Hallmark cards. No special birth certificates or driver’s licenses. No social media or protestor chants that “Nullos are No Sex!” or “Nullo rights are human rights!” They are even strangely absent from GLAADs Media Reference Guide for journalists discussing “Trans.” Nullo is a term used for, almost always, men (Surprise!) who wish to have their genitals removed, and often their nipples too, creating a smooth body appearance. Nullo is short for genital nullification, which involves removing all external genitalia. Nullo is considered a non-binary identity, also sometimes referred to as neutrois identity. At the Cranes Center in Ca. and Texas for genital surgeries and Davis Plastic Surgery Center, also in Ca., Nullos are recognized under “gender surgeries” they perform. Yet strangely, Nullos are absent from the ABC’s of L.G.B.T.Q.I.A.+ , and under the “Transgender” umbrella. Transgender Europe is the largest organization promoting the normalization of “transgender” identities, but on their website, Nullos are nowhere to be found. The same can be said for Arcus Foundation, the largest LGBT NGO promoting “transgender” identity globally. Where are the Non-Binary Nullos? Asexuals, pansexuals, grey sexual and demisexuals have all come forward for their piece of the sympathy pie since the madness of gender identity hit the ground running in western cultures. Teen Vogue reported in 2016 about the trauma of non-binary people getting a haircut, but the Nullos have hung back (no pun intended). Polygenders feel very left out.. Poor demisexuals will never fall in love at first sight. Grey sexuals are terrified of coming out to their partners because their partners may feel like they are using their grey sexual lovers, since grey sexuals don’t desire sex but don’t mind having it (unlike asexuals, they can take it or leave it). But the dangers to Nullos are not clear. No one knows how many men are identifying as Nullos. Not a lot of them are rising up (sorry, I couldn’t resist) to be counted. In a National Health Institute report on what they euphemistically call “Transgender/Non-Binary Gender Confirmation surgery,” men identifying as women report bottom surgery at rates between 5–13%. In other words, most men claiming they are women never have their penises or gonads removed. One would think it would be a constant reminder for these men of their maleness. Men don’t like discussing the removal of their genitalia and think it’s pretty rude to ask them questions about it. In 2014 Laverne Cox “schooled” Katie Couric about her inappropriate inquiry on the matter on national TV. When it comes to women and children, though, no such etiquette is required, as in the case of Jazz Jennings, barely an adult whose entire trajectory of surgical complications for his castration was fodder for his reality show. Women who’ve removed their breasts to appease the gender gods are routinely used in advertisements and make national news with their surgical scars displayed, promoting amputation of healthy breasts as self-empowerment, not dysphoria. Is it possible that with all this talk of “gender self-identification” and men identifying as women, and men supporting men identifying as women, that men don’t really, on the whole, want to part with their penises or the privilege incurred by having one? They seemingly have no desire to talk about the majority of them keeping their penises while parading around as women. Is it possible that men don’t want to hear about other men parting with their penises either, as in the case of Nullos, and don’t want to support this elephant-in-the-room aspect of “transition?” Where is their sympathy for the non-binary Nullos? This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

The non-sensical logic that sex is a spectrum, brought to us by the growing gender identity industry, is a new advertising campaign slogan. First, there was “Trans women are women,” which, when unpacked, simply means men are women. Gaining traction is a new slogan, the notion that we are not a sexually dimorphic species, that we are not born as male or female but that there is a unifying theme between the extremes of male and female that constitute a spectrum of sex – which obliterates sex the same way “men are women” erases sex. Disorders of sexual development are known as intersex conditions. Much to the chagrin of the tiny part of the population who have these disorders, they have been politically co-opted to help solidify this falsehood of sex being a spectrum by powerful elites with a big agenda. Intersex conditions do not constitute additional sexes, but this is how their condition has been used by the gender lobby. There are only two gametes - Male and Female. According to the gender lobby, people with intersex conditions need to be liberated from the “social construct” of sexual dimorphism. But the notion of a sex spectrum places a tiny fraction of people with intersex conditions outside the human race, which is sexually dimorphic. Intersex conditions are used as a political cudgel to drive gender identity mythology and the idea of sex as a spectrum. Interestingly, the root of the word spectrum from Latin means image or apparition, including the meaning specter, a source of terror that is not physically present. Spectral evidence is testimony about what was done by ghosts, persons not present physically. And this is precisely how the sex spectrum presents in the discourse of gender identity mythology because there is no proof of a sex spectrum, nor anyone that is not a male or a female. There is no sex change. All of it is an apparition. There is only an illusion - a terrifying one - because it is rapidly making its way into the language, discourse, institutions, and law by powerful men with deep investments in technology and pharmacology, the things needed to uphold the specters of "transgenderism" and "transsexualism." "Transsexualism" is a male sexual fetish, an obsession with being aroused by the idea of oneself as a woman. Its roots are in body dissociation and the objectification of women. Until now it wasn’t a lucrative market for the medical-industrial complex. That is until it was repackaged into a profitable identity called "transgenderism." The mythology of transgenderism currently being worshipped in society is raking in money. More importantly, the changes to the law that solidify the specter, afford the gods of tech and Pharma the right to breach the boundaries of our sex. Toward this end, what “sex is a spectrum” means is less important than what “sex is a spectrum” does as it enters the lexicon, law, and the social fabric. Beyond what the state has done to objectify and commodify women's sexed humanity with the porn, surrogacy, and prostitution industries, the state is now deconstructing sex toward the abolition of sex. If men can be women and sex is a spectrum, women can have penises; men can give birth, sperm can be injected, eggs harvested and transplanted, embryos grown in a dish, wombs transplanted; sex can be removed from birth certificates, health records, and crime stats then we are being dissociated from what it means to be human, a sexually dimorphic species, whole beings. We may still have sex for a time, but being one-half of the sexually dimorphic species will become obsolete. The corporate drive for “Inclusiveness and diversity” and the money pouring into normalizing the dissociating fetish of transsexualism rebranded to "transgenderism," brought into the marketplace, and our institutions simultaneously are not about including all people. They are meant to solidify an illusion of a multiplicity of sexes, and identities to be marketed to and profited from until our sex becomes a marketplace and ceases to be sex at all. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

Driven by techno-capitalist profiteering, which is moving faster than we can imagine to exploit our sex, the LGB civil rights movement of yore has become an identarian consumerist orgy. The LGB civil rights movement, along with intersex conditions, has been co-opted by the corporate state to drive a profitable narrative of “sex is a spectrum” via “transgenderism.” Same-sex desire is being conflated with sexual fetishes being played out in public. This is harming children and is turning the clock back on public understanding of LGBs. Community public space should not be a free-for-all for fetishists. Adults and children have been subject to increasing profiteering and exposure to the abject sexual objectification of women for generations by techno-capitalism. Now, the marketers are coming for the kids under a rainbow banner of fetishes and flying unicorns. It’s happening fast. Despite the sex trafficking of children being at an all-time high, we now have drag queen story hours (DQSH) at national libraries. “Inclusivity & diversity,” the new “LGBT” mantra, sells acceptance of sexed-body-multiplicity, not diversity of people. DQSH didn't just happen to be rolled out in the culture with the ascendence of synthetic sex identities. An activity formerly reserved for gay men’s nightclubs did not just become children’s entertainment by fiat. Nor is it just harmless “story hour,” which might be bearable if the readers read age-appropriate material for children. Emerging simultaneously have been pole dancers and sexualized performances for kids, brought to you by Planned Parenthood, the same organization flooded by the gender industry and Pharma-lobby funding and selling cross-sex hormones to young adults. Desmond is Amazing, a (now) 12yr old drag queen being flaunted on national TV and exploited by the emerging gender identity industry, who wants to teach other children how to be drag queens. Jazz Jennings, a (now) young man who thinks he’s a young woman, has been on TV since he was four, making rounds on the talk show circuit. Now in college, with a reality TV show that has presented Jazz’s botched “sex reassignment surgery” to the masses for celebration (No kidding, a penis castration cake and all!), we have indeed gone down the rabbit hole and are not coming back. Caligula’s Rome had nothing on this display. Body dissociation and objectification for celebration are being glamorized. A disorder of perception about one’s body, on par with anorexia and body identity integrity disorder, is being normalized under a civil rights umbrella for LGBs, as are adult men with fetishes. People are noticing, and the medical-industrial complex is profiting. Children are being taught as future consumers. Transsexualism, otherwise known as Autogynephilia, is a fetish of grown men sexually objectifying women, dissociating from their sex, and wanting validation from the world that they are women. It’s been repackaged by techno-capitalism and rolled out as “sex is a spectrum.” Elites are manifesting an industry based on medical/tech identities encouraging sexed-body-dysphoria. “Sex is a spectrum” is a glamorous ad campaign selling dissociation from your sexed body as progressive. It’s now being sold to children. It is pathological profiteering, corporatism at its zenith, with nothing left to colonize except the human body. Techno-capitalism has reached the full-on cannibal stage. Parents, unhappy with the new “LGBT” extreme sex ed curriculums in their kid’s schools, also rolled out with the ascendance of synthetic sex identities in the culture and paid for by gender industry funding, are having huge problems fighting the force with which these curriculums are being implemented. However, Research has repeatedly proved that children develop significant problems with their identities and bodies when exposed to overt sexual material. Pride parade, often attended by families, has become something to visually cringe at, with scenes from an underground BDSM leather bar becoming standard. Men dressed in leather dog masks and thongs performing puppy kink are a new norm. Children are indoctrinated with the idea that fetish, body dissociation, and objectifying others for sexual pleasure are normal and healthy. What’s next, pedophilia as progressive? It’s coming. Pedophiles are being repackaged as MAPs, or Minor Attracted Persons. MAPs are already edging their way into the rainbow coalition. According to MAPs, their desire to have sex with children is not wrong as long as they don’t act on it. But the idea that they want to expose people to their feelings undergirds a desire for validation and normalization. This is a problem. No one wants to confront the elephant in the room. It’s uncomfortable, but transgenderism, having morphed from and seeking to obscure its fetishistic roots in transsexualism, is no less predatory than pedophilia. They are both based on sexual boundary violations. One violates the boundaries of human sexual dimorphism, specifically the female sex (though “transitions” for young women are growing in demand), and the other breaks the sexual boundaries of children. LGBs have nothing to do with this, and their civil rights movement was, in part, a means of countering conflations with this type of behavior. LGB is not an identity aside from what corporations have made of it. It does not objectify others inherently. It is not a fetish, and it does not promote dissociation from one’s body or the violation of others’ bodies. For humanity to accept this dissociation as standard, as part of LGB civil rights, as brave, as progressive, and to surrender to the marketing campaign of profiteers that this is worth celebrating, is wrong. To allow for the marketing, promotion, and normalization of this to young adults and children, as is happening now in public, in the media, and in their schools, is sexually abusive and should be criminal. They will learn young how to dissociate from their sexed bodies. They will learn it in their schools and the social environment around them, and they will be the perfect adult consumers, as well as the consumed. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.