Search Results

Download the PDF to view the entire flow chart: (Article From 2018 - updated stats have been added) As an environmental activist who was deplatformed from a speaking venue by transactivists, in 2013 I developed a curiosity about the power of this group to force this development. A year later, when Time magazine announced a transgender tipping point on its cover, I had already begun to examine the money behind the transgender project. I have watched as women’s safe spaces, universities, and sports opened their doors to any man who chose to identify as a woman. Whereas men who identify as transwomen are at the forefront of this project, women who identify as transmen seem silent and invisible. I was astonished that such a huge cultural change as the opening of sex-protected spaces was happening at such a meteoric pace and without consideration for women and girls’ safety, deliberation, or public debate. Concurrent with these rapid changes, I witnessed an overhaul in the English language with new pronouns and a near-tyrannical assault on those who did not use them. Laws mandating new speech were passed. Laws overriding biological sex with the amorphous concept of gender identity are being instituted now. People who speak openly about these changes can find themselves, their families, and their livelihoods threatened. These elements, along with media saturation of the issue, had me wondering: Is this really a civil rights issue for a tiny part of the population with body dysphoria, or is there a bigger agenda with moneyed interests that we are not seeing? This article can only begin to graze the surface of this question, but considering transgenderism has basically exploded in the middle of capitalism, which is notorious for subsuming social justice movements, there is value in beginning this examination. Who Is Funding the Transgender Movement? I found exceedingly rich, white men with enormous cultural influence are funding the transgender lobby and various transgender organizations. These include but are not limited to Jennifer Pritzker (a male who identifies as transgender); George Soros; Martine Rothblatt (a male who identifies as transgender and transhumanist); Tim Gill (a gay man); Drummond Pike; Warren and Peter Buffett; Jon Stryker (a gay man); Mark Bonham (a gay man); and Ric Weiland (a deceased gay man whose philanthropy is still LGBT-oriented). Most of these billionaires fund the transgender lobby and organizations through their own organizations, including corporations. Separating transgender issues from LGBT infrastructure is not an easy task. All the wealthiest donors have been funding LGB institutions before they became LGBT-oriented, and only in some instances are monies earmarked specifically for transgender issues. Some of these billionaires fund the LGBT through their myriad companies, multiplying their contributions many times over in ways that are also difficult to track. These funders often go through anonymous funding organizations such as Tides Foundation, founded and operated by Pike. Large corporations, philanthropists, and organizations can send enormous sums of money to the Tides Foundation, specify the direction the funds are to go and have the funds get to their destination anonymously. Tides Foundation creates a legal firewall and tax shelter for foundations and funds political campaigns, often using legally dubious tactics. These men and others, including pharmaceutical companies and the U.S. government, are sending millions of dollars to LGBT causes. The overall consumer market of LGBT is now estimated at $3.7 Trillion. From 2003-to 2013, reported funding for transgender issues increased more than eightfold, growing at threefold the increase of LGBTQ funding overall, which quadrupled from 2003 to 2012. This huge spike in funding happened at the same time transgenderism began gaining traction in American culture. $3.7 Trillion is a lot of money. Is it enough to change laws, uproot language and force new speech on the public, to censor, to create an atmosphere of threat for those who do not comply with gender identity ideology? Transgenderism: A New Medical and Lifestyle Market It seems obvious now to look at the money behind transgenderism. Many new markets have opened because of it. The first gender clinic for children opened in Boston in 2007. In the past ten years, more than 30 clinics for children with purported gender dysphoria have arisen in the United States alone, the largest serving 725 patients. Over the past decade, there has been an explosion in transgender medical infrastructure across the United States and the world to “treat” transgender people. In addition to gender clinics proliferating across the United States, hospital wings are being built for specialized surgeries, and many medical institutions are clamoring to get on board with the new developments. Doctors are being trained in symposiums across the world in all manner of surgeries related to transgender individuals, including phalloplasty, vaginoplasty, facial feminization surgery, urethral procedures, and more. More and more American corporations are covering transgender surgeries, drugs, and other expenses. Endocrinologists seeking the fountain of youth in hormones for more than a generation, and the subsequent earnings for marketing those hormones, are still on a quest for gold. Puberty blockers are another growing market. The plastic surgery arm of medicine is staged for an infusion of cash as well as organ transplants, especially womb transplants for men identifying as women who may want future pregnancies. These surgeries are already being practiced on animals and the first successful womb implant from a deceased female donor to another female has already been a success. Biogenetics is poised to be the investment of the future, says Rothblatt, who has headed a massive pharmaceutical corporation and is now heavily invested in biogenetics and transplants. Transgenderism has certainly made its way into the American marketplace, so it seems important to consider the implications of this as we pass laws regarding transgender individuals’ and our civil liberties. Transgenderism sits square in the middle of the medical-industrial complex, which is by some estimates even bigger than the military-industrial complex. With the medical infrastructure being built, doctors being trained for various surgeries, clinics opening at warp speed, and the media celebrating it, transgenderism is poised for growth. The LGB, a once-tiny group of people trying to love those of the same sex openly and be treated equally within society, has likely already been subsumed by capitalism and is now infiltrated by the medical-industrial complex via transgenderism. Who Works to Institutionalize Transgender Ideology? Much more important than funds going directly to the LGBT lobby and organizations, only a fraction of which trickles down to assist people who identify as transgender, is the money invested by the men mentioned above, governments, technology, and pharmaceutical corporations to institutionalize and normalize transgenderism as a lifestyle choice. They are shaping the narrative about transgenderism and normalizing it within the culture using their funding methods. This article will use the Pritzker family as a case study, both to reduce the length and because they are emblematic of how this works. Those funding trans organizations and normalizing transgenderism are channeling funds in the same ways and invested in the same medical infrastructure. This can hardly be a coincidence when the very thing absolutely essential to those transitioning are pharmaceuticals and technology. It is also important to note that though the trans lobby has sewn itself to the LGB umbrella, LGB people as such are not lifelong medical patients. The Pritzkers are an American family of philanthropic billionaires worth approximately $29 billion, whose fortune was gestated by Hyatt Hotels and nursing homes. They now have massive investments in the medical-industrial complex. Examining just a few of the Pritzkers in this article will give you some indication of their reach and influence as a family, especially as regards the transgender project and their relationship to the medical-industrial complex. As you read, remember, transitioning individuals are medical patients for life and the Pritzker family are not an anomaly in their funding trajectory or investments in the medical-industrial complex. Jennifer Pritzker Once a family man and a decorated member of the armed forces, Jennifer Pritzker now identifies as transgender. He has made transgenderism a high note in philanthropic funding through his Tawani Foundation. He is one of the largest contributors to transgender causes and, with his family, has an enormous influence in the rapid institutionalization of transgenderism. Some of the organizations Jennifer owns and funds are especially noteworthy to examining the rapid induction of transgender ideology into medical, legal, and educational institutions. Pritzker owns Squadron Capital, an acquisitions corporation, with a focus on medical technology, medical devices, and orthopedic implants, and the Tawani Foundation, a philanthropic organization with a grants focus on Gender & Human Sexuality. Pritzker sits on the leadership council of the Program of Human Sexuality at the University of Minnesota, to which he also committed $6.5 million over the past decade. Among many other organizations and institutions, Pritzker funds are Lurie Children’s Hospital, a medical center for gender non-conforming children, serving 400 children in Chicago; the Pritzker School of Medicine at the University of Chicago; a chair of transgender studies at the University of Victoria (the first of its kind); and the Mark S. Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies at the University of Toronto. He also funds the American Civil Liberties Union and his family funds Planned Parenthood, two significant organizations for institutionalizing female-erasing language and support for transgender causes. Planned Parenthood also recently decided to get into the transgender medical market. Jennifer Pritzker funds strategically, as does his family, by giving to universities that become beholden to his ideology, whose students go on to spread gender ideology by writing pro-trans articles in medical journals and elsewhere. Jennifer’s uncle and aunt, John and Lisa Pritzker, gave $25 million to the University of California at San Francisco for a center of children’s psychiatry. Jennifer likewise funds hospitals and medical schools where the alumni go on to create transgender specialties and LGBT medical centers, even though lesbians, gays, and bisexuals don’t need specialized medical services. Here are just several current activities of Pritzker-funded medical school alumni and recipients of Pritzker money. James Hekman founded the LGBT medical care center in Lakewood Ohio. David T. Rubin sits on the advisory board of Accordant/CVS Caremark, the largest pharmaceutical chain in the United States. CVS acquired Target department stores’ pharmacies in 2015. Target, of course, is the site of a major social controversy about unisex bathrooms and is a corporate funder of the trans-pushing Human Rights Campaign activist group. Loren Schecter is the author of the first surgical atlas for transgender surgery, author of pro-trans journals, was awarded for legal advocacy of transgenders, performs reconstructive surgeries, and is director of transfeminine conferences sponsored by World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH). He also performs reconstructive surgeries at Weiss Memorial Hospital in Chicago. Schecter is also the “surgeons only sessions chair” on the Scientific Program Committee of the newly formed United States arm of WPATH (World Professional Association of Transgender Health), USPATH, holding conferences in Los Angeles for surgeons in transgender surgeries. Robert Garofalo, a gay man, is director of the St. Lurie children’s gender clinic, head of the hospital’s division of adolescent medicine, and a professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University, which J.B. Pritzker (whom we will meet later) funds. Benjamin N. Breyer is chief of urology at San Francisco General Hospital and a professor at the University of California at San Francisco, specializing in transgender surgery. Nicholas Matte teaches at the Mark Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies at the University of Toronto, with a specialty in queer studies. Jennifer Pritzker also funds the Bonham Centre. Matte lectures around the country on transgender issues, and espouses the idea that we are not a sexually dimorphic species. Mark Hyman is the Pritzker Foundation Chair in functional medicine at the Cleveland Clinic and director of the Cleveland Clinic Center for Functional Medicine. Cleveland Clinic conducted the United States’ first uterus transplant. Baylor College of Medicine is on the receiving end of the Pritzker School of Medicine’s “pipeline programs” for people studying to be doctors. Baylor is where the nation’s first child was born from a uterus transplant as part of an experimental program funding the procedure for 10 women in order to develop uterus transplants ultimately health insurance and taxpayers will pay for rather than being relegated to elective infertility treatment. Jennifer Pritzker has also helped normalize transgender individuals in the military with a $1.35 million grant to the Palm Center, a University of California, Santa Barbara-based LGBT think tank, to create research validating military transgenderism. He has also donated $25 million to Norwich University in Vermont, a military academy and the first school to launch a Naval Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program. Pritzker’s funding is not confined to the United States, but reaches other countries via WPATH, in conferences for physicians studying transgender surgery, and funding of international universities. Penny Pritzker Cousin to Jennifer Pritzker, Penny Pritzker served on President Obama’s Council for Jobs and Competitiveness and Economic Recovery Advisory Board. She was national co-chair of Obama for America 2012 and national finance chair of Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. To say she was influential in getting President Obama elected would be an understatement. As Obama’s secretary of commerce, Penny Pritzker helped create the National Institute for Innovation in Manufacturing Biopharmaceuticals (NIIMBL), by facilitating an award of $70 million from the U.S. Department of Commerce, the first funding of its kind. Obama made transgenderism a pet issue of his administration, holding a meeting at the White House (the first ever) for transgenderism. The administration quietly applied the power of the executive branch to make it easier for transgender people to alter their passports, get cross-sex treatment at Veteran’s Administration facilities, and access public school restrooms and sports programs based on gender identity. These are just a few of the transgender-specific policy shifts of Obama’s presidency. Soros and Gill are two other major transgender movement funders who generated millions of dollars to get Obama elected, and Stryker was one of the top five contributors to Obama’s campaign. Under Obama and President George W. Bush, the federal government also funded the Tides Foundation $82.7 million, which in turn donated $47.2 million to LGBTQ issues over the last two decades. Penny has funded the Harvard School of Public Health and, with her husband through their mutual foundation, The Pritzker Traubert Family Foundation, are funding early childhood initiatives as well as providing scholarships to Harvard University medical students. The Boston Children’s Hospital Gender Management Services wing physicians are all affiliated with Harvard Medical School. Penny Pritzker also sat on the board at Harvard, where student life offices teach students, many of whom go on to lead U.S. institutions, that “there are more than two sexes.” J.B. Pritzker Penny Pritzker’s brother, J.B. Pritzker, is an American venture capitalist, entrepreneur, philanthropist, and business owner. He is co-founder of the Pritzker Group, a private investment firm that invests in digital technology and medical companies, including Clinical Innovations, which has a global presence. Clinical Innovations is one of the largest medical device companies and in 2017 acquired Brenner Medical, another significant medical group offering innovative products in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. J.B. provided seed funding for Matter, a startup incubator for medical technology based in Chicago. He also sits on the board of directors at his alma mater, Duke University, where they are making advances in cryopreserving women’s ovaries. J.B. is running for governor of Illinois in 2018 and put $25 million into an Obama administration public-private initiative totaling $1 billion for early childhood education. J.B. and his wife, M.K. Pritzker, donated $100 million to Northwestern University School of Law, partly for scholarships and partly for the school’s “social justice” and childhood law work. We have to look at why this is framed as a civil rights issue when the main issues seem to be capital and social engineering. There doesn’t seem to be a sphere of influence that is untouched by Pritzker money, from early childhood education and universities to law, medical institutions, the LGBT lobby and organizations, politics, and the military. If they were the only ones funding the institutionalization of transgender ideology they would still be fantastically influential, but they are joined by other exceedingly wealthy, influential white men, who also have ties to the pharmaceutical and medical industries. Pharma and Tech Giants All-In for Transgender Along with support by pharmaceutical giants such as Janssen Therapeutics, the health foundation of a Johnson and Johnson founder, Viiv, Pfizer, Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, major technology corporations including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Intel, Dell, and IBM are also funding the transgender project. In February 2017, Apple, Microsoft, Google, IBM, Yelp, PayPal, and 53 other mostly tech corporations signed onto an amicus brief pushing the U.S. Supreme Court to prohibit schools from keeping private facilities for students designated according to sex. As these corporations were pushing for transgender bathrooms, they were fighting President Trump’s travel ban and immigration policies. In reporting the incidents simultaneously, CNN News made the obvious connection between the corporations’ interest in the immigration ban and commerce, quoting a legal brief signed by the companies that said, “It is inflicting significant harm on American business, innovation, and growth.” It made no such equivalent connection for the corporations’ interest in transgender rights. The obvious question would be: Why do they care? The obvious answer is money. It behooves us all to look at what the real investment is in prioritizing a lifetime of anti-body medical treatments for a minuscule part of the population. Melding this manufactured medical issue with the civil rights frame entails the continuance and growth of the problem. Transgenderism is framed as both a medical problem, for the gender dysphoria of children who need puberty blockers and are being groomed for a lifetime of medicalization, and as a brave and original lifestyle choice for adults. Martine Rothblatt suggests we are all transhuman, that changing our bodies by removing healthy tissue and organs and ingesting cross-sex hormones over the course of a lifetime can be likened to wearing make-up, dying our hair, or getting a tattoo. If we are all transhuman, expressing that could be a never-ending saga of body-related consumerism. The massive medical and technological infrastructure expansion for a tiny (but growing) fraction of the population with gender dysphoria, along with the money being funneled to this project by those heavily invested in the medical and technology industries, seems to make sense only in the context of expanding markets for changing the human body. Trans activists are already clamoring for a change from “gender dysphoria” to “gender incongruence” in the next revision to the international register of mental diagnosis codes, the ICD-11. The push is on for insurance-paid hormones and surgeries for anyone who believes his or her body is in any way “incongruent” with his or her “gender identity.” Bodily diversity appears to be the core issue, not gender dysphoria; that and unmooring people from their biology via language distortions, to normalize altering human biology. Institutionalizing transgender ideology does just this. This ideology is being promoted as a civil rights issue by wealthy, white, men with enormous influence who stand to personally benefit from their political activities. It behooves us all to look at what the real investment is in prioritizing a lifetime of anti-body medical treatments for a minuscule part of the population, building an infrastructure for them, and institutionalizing the way we perceive ourselves as human beings, before being human becomes a quaint concept of the past. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Use this link for donations. Thank you. This article has been corrected to note the difference between Baylor University and Baylor College of Medicine. The two are no longer connected. Jennifer Bilek is an artist, environmental activist, writer, and an engaged citizen. Flow Chart compliments of Angus fox (@madadhruadh) who is part of the resistance. Article originally published in The Federalist.(now with updated information and links)

The massive rearranging of western societies at warp speed, purportedly to address a human rights issue for a minuscule part of the population with identity issues, is the height of absurdity. That so many people have bought this ridiculous narrative and swallowed it whole as if they’d been living on a desert island and happened upon the first potential food source in a week, is a fantastic thing to behold. People who understand the oppressive structure of corporate capitalism, who’ve been fighting its colonizing ravages at myriad fronts for the past two generations, are turning a blind eye to world governments, multi-national corporations, Big Banks, Big Tech and Big Pharma investments in the narrative of “wrong heads in wrong bodies” and the idea that men can be women. Likewise, no one is asking why they are investing in changing our language and our laws, disappearing women’s rights, supporting the drugging and mutilation of children and why the largest international law firm in the world is invested in the legal construction of “transgender children.” It does not fit that all our human rights organizations, our institutions, our medical establishments, universities, and legal bodies are also simultaneously being engineered to this concept of gender identity and the tiny population of people who have identity issues focused on their sexed bodies because they care. To think so, while we stand on a planet laid to waste because of corporate greed and malfeasance, is simply insane. To believe such absurdities, we might as well be living inside a cult, much like Scientology, except global in scale. Martine Rothblatt, a transsexual-transhumanist planted the seeds to foster a legal construct of disembodiment as identity, forged out of his paraphilia of owning female biology for himself, in the 1980s. The advancement of his ideology that seeks to deconstruct sexual dimorphism in an effort to cultivate the social and legal groundwork for melding humanity to AI, is too big a leap for many people to make. "Gender Identity" is a bridge to get you there. Transhumanism sounds like some sort of futuristic, dystopian sci-fi novel that could never actually materialize. Yet what people don’t see is what Martine Rothblatt and the other elite corporatists colonizing human sex for profit do see - the advancements in technology and a totalitarian market that are rapidly moving us toward this melding. Most people do not see the technological advancements for governing the reproductive capacities of women or the colonization process underway toward that end. They do not see the correlations between transgenderism and transhumanism, which are vast and overlap, but are largely playing out in the different categories of human rights and scientific developments. Those different categories are only superficial, a political mask for social engineering purposes. Scientists have created a Frog-robot from living skin and heart stem cells of the African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, a robot that mimics in many ways the frog it was molded from. The machines are tiny creatures, less than a millimeter (0.04 inches) wide, and can walk and swim, survive for weeks without food, and work together in groups. They, however, can’t evolve or recreate - yet. What’s unique about these creatures is that they can heal by themselves when wounded. Advancements in neuro-prosthetic artificial limbs for humans have already melded humans with AI. Bionic limbs can now go beyond being governed by the human mind. Sensors placed on the amputated limb can now send muscle signals to the bionic arm which the AI in the mechanical arm then learns from, replicating human movement. The amputated limb melded to the new technology can afford a sense of touch to the person whose limb has been removed. At the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Pentagon's avant-garde research arm, the Biological Technologies Office (BTO), which opened in April 2014, aims to support extremely ambitious technologies ranging from powered exoskeletons for soldiers to brain implants that can control mental disorders. DARPA's program managers at the BTO are free to pour tens of millions of dollars into ambitious projects without waiting around for niceties such as peer review. These developments are being studied at the Applied Physics Laboratory of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Rothblatt has been a speaker at John Hopkins, the first hospital in the United States to perform surgeries for men who pretend to be female. His talks centered on digital immortality. He has also been involved in the human genome project and invented Sirius satellite radio. Rothblatt is a member of The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, funded by DARPA. Lynn Conway, an 83-year-old man, who has posed as a woman since 1968, after marriage to a woman and fathering two children, is widely known for the Mead & Conway revolution in very large scale integrated (VLSI) microchip design. He was recruited by IBM Research in Yorktown Heights, New York in 1964, and was soon selected to join the architecture team designing an advanced supercomputer. After learning of the pioneering research of Harry Benjamin in treating men who sexually desired female biology for their own and realizing that surgeries to hide one’s sex were suddenly possible, Conway sought Benjamin’s help and became his patient. In the early 1980s, Conway left Xerox to join DARPA, where he was a key architect of the Defense Department's Strategic Computing Initiative, a research program studying high-performance computing, autonomous systems technology, and intelligent weapons technology. He retired from active teaching and research in 1998, as professor emerita at the University of Michigan - just one of many universities funded by the Pritzker family who have vast investments in both the medical-industrial complex and the gender identity industry. Conway has lectured, along with Rothblatt at the University of Victoria British Columbia, Chair in Transgender Studies conferences, Moving Trans History Forward. The Trans Chair position was made possible with funding by Jennifer Pritzker, another man seeking to own female biology as his own. Conway, along with Rothblatt, has received an Honorary Doctorate from the University. Conway, Like Rothblatt and Pritzker, is a fierce advocate for LGBTQI. In 2009, Conway was named one of the "Stonewall 40 trans heroes" on the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots by the International Court System, one of the oldest and largest predominantly gay organizations in the world, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. Petra de Sutter is another man pretending to be a woman, at the forefront of driving the technological colonization of female reproductive capacities, the gender identity industry, and the CRISPR technology poised to change the human race. He is a Belgian gynecologist and politician representing the Green party who has been a Deputy Prime Minister in the government of Prime Minister Alexander De Croo since 2020. He has also worked as a professor of gynecology at Ghent University, head of the Department of Reproductive Medicine at Ghent University Hospital (UZ Gent). He is the first transgender minister in Europe. In addition to his role in the Senate, De Sutter served as a member of the Belgian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe from 2014 until 2019. He served as the Assembly’s rapporteur on children’s rights in relation to surrogacy arrangements (2016) and on the use of new genetic technologies in human beings (2017). In 2018, De Sutter discussed gene editing, transhumanism, and the future of technological reproduction - sans women - in a TEDTalk. Tim Gill, founder, Chairman, and Chief Technology Officer of Quark, Inc. a software corporation left his company in 2000 to create one of the largest LGBT NGOs in the US, pouring half a billion dollars into rearranging society to his cause, more recently gender identity ideology. He now operates a technologically sophisticated home-automation, AI company, for a luxury market. We must understand the corporatism and social engineering at the root of the gender identity industry if we are to have any success in resisting the move toward transhumanism and post-humanism. For the former, efforts are well underway, while society is being blindsided thinking they are supporting a human rights movement, when in fact, the ground is being cultivated for normalizing body dissociation by unmooring us from our roots in sex. Posthumanism is the end game of our species. If we do not turn this bullet train around now, we will enter an engineered evolution beyond what is human. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you. Image attribution: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

In 1943, Sophia Magdalena Scholl, a German student, and anti-Nazi political activist, working in the non-violent resistance group, White Rose Society, in Nazi Germany, was convicted of high treason. She and her brother, Hans had been found distributing anti-war leaflets at the University of Munich. They were executed by guillotine. She was 22 years old. Sophie and her brother were allowed a brief exchange with their parents before their execution, in which their parents offered their love and support for their children’s actions before bidding them a last farewell. I am hard-pressed to say who of the four exhibited the most courage and self-respect that day. Was it Hans? Was it Sophie, who said as they led her to the guillotine, “what a lovely sunny day and I have to go,” or was it their parents who offered their support, love, and understanding, in that little room before their children were led away? There were no hysterics of losing. They understood what it is to stand courageously in love, against the odds. There were no regrets. We are up against an apparatus today that is as anti-human and supremacist, like that faced by Sophie and Hans and we must, at the very least, find a measure of the courage they exhibited that day if humanity is to survive. We must be willing to sacrifice. We must be able to act in solidarity against the gender identity industry that is a corporate mission to colonize human sex, right down to our genetic code. This agenda has nothing to do with human rights. It is naked corporatism and human supremacy driving us off a cliff. We have little time to act. The choices are stark: act in solidarity against this machine or we are over, as a species. This is not a project that can be accomplished alone and it is one that demands no compromise. We must find our way back to each other. If you are one, become two. If you are two, become three. Act. It is terrifying to contemplate what losing this battle will mean. Though it seems scary to act against this totalitarian regime, it is in our unity where we will find and stand rooted in our love for the world. We are, after all, alive to be in love. This is why we resist. The natural world has given us everything. Our appreciation, respect, and understanding of this very simple fact, will afford us the resolve we need to leave something for those that come behind us. On this day of flimsy love, corporatized like everything else, for profiteering off our emotions, let’s contemplate the sacrifices of those who came before us so that we could be better positioned to create a livable world for those who come after. We are nothing without them. We must reach back and remember, so we can be rooted firmly in our resolve to fight back against those who literally wish to dismember us. And to my comrades in arms, each one of you standing tall, this is my valentine to you. It is your resolve in love and courage that keeps me firmly planted in my own. I have found in solidarity, love which I could not have known without you and I offer you my appreciation with my insistence to keep going. Thank you for standing up. Thank you for speaking up, for resisting, for fighting, for telling the truth when it has been in short supply. Thank you for taking the risk. There are so many of you, I couldn’t possibly make a list. Some of you I have never even met, but I feel you there. Some of us have stood next to each other at another protest, some of us have met week after week, year after year, wondering if our actions were having any impact, as we planned, talked, tweeted, messaged, and spent long hours on the phone, raging, laughing and sometimes crying. Some of you were there from the beginning, calling me from between the covers of a book - some of them written ages ago - books they may again start burning for wrong think - books guiding me to the next action. Solidarity is not just another word. It matters. Resistance may be the greatest love story we have ever known. Rise against the transhumanist cult of death. Choose life. Only together, is failure impossible. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you.

In the age of 24/7 tech surveillance and confession capitalism, whereby ordinary individuals confess the most intimate details of their lives and thoughts for money, attention, or likes on social media, privacy is in very short supply. Each day, life in general, looks more and more like an episode of the Jerry Springer show, as noted by journalist Julian Vigo, except we can’t go home when the show is over. The show doesn’t end. The normalization of men’s sexual fetishes played out in society is eroding our privacy further. In the past couple of years, there has been a spate of men who either used to identify as female or still do, who now perform public confessions about their autogynephilia. These confessions lull us into complacency about what this fetish does in the material world, keeping us wrapped up in the pornified, dissociated, and objectifying male psyche where we are used to living. The erosion of privacy for others who do not consent to be privy to others’ fetishistic displays is not the only thing being cultivated. The intensified dehumanization of females laid on the sacrificial altar of men’s sexual gratification is also being demanded. The dehumanization of females is ok as long as it alleviates men’s dysphoria. How awful it must be to have a daughter today and to know that she will walk through the world where her biology, her humanity, is treated as parts for men’s sexual gratification and that this is normal. Her sexual objectification is no longer sexual objectification. It has been erased, along with her humanity. It has become his identity. James Shupe, in an article in Intellectual Takeout last year, takes us on a journey from his self-ID as female, then as a non-binary person, to the accolades of many, including the media, and back to an embrace of his actual biological reality and his autogynephilia. In the course of this journey, which feels a lot like the story of the boy who cried wolf, Shupe gives us the intimate details of his “sins” (BDSM, sex clubs, etc.). He wants us to believe he is making amend and starting a new life, but his sexual proclivities are still shoved in our faces. Women who've had their sex brutalized by the medical-industrial complex and have grown into an understanding of what has happened to them sound, comparatively, like the stories of those returning from a war zone, compelling us to understand their feeble attempts to find a way out of sexual objectification, subordination, and homophobia. In June of last year, Corinna Cohn, made his true confession via an article in Quillette, which is far more palatable but centers his “affliction,” his feelings, and his suffering with no mention of the harm in parading his paraphilia in public, as he is coming to terms with being an autogynephile. He feels "displaced as a transsexual" because dissociation and sexual objectification of others have become cool and trendy. Poor Corinna. Try being an object. There is zero acknowledgment of the continued harm or suffering caused to females when we are publicly reduced to parts one can buy in a Sears catalog or surgeon's office to get off on. We are dehumanized, even as Cohn seeks to understand what feminists think. He takes the advice of one that he should not be ashamed to be transsexual. Perhaps his fantasy should not be shamed. Maybe it is only the public parading of his fetish that reduces women to parts and violates everyone’s privacy not to be engaged in other people’s sexual proclivities that should be shamed. Kate Madden made his true confession in November last year in a tell-all video about his autogynephilia, to cultivate sympathy for his “condition.” I want to know where the sympathy resides for the women exposed to a grown man impersonating them for his sexual gratification. Our sexual objectification and dehumanization are the cost of alleviating these men’s dysphoria. In what universe should one person’s objectification be used to mitigate another’s discomfort while evoking public sympathy? Inspireverse is a youtube platform giving voice to yet another male with this “disorder” of objectifying female biology for his sexual gratification, who thinks breaking it down for the public so they can understand it should cultivate our sympathies and make society a better place to live. WHOOSH! For whom, I might ask? Certainly not for women who are treated like objects in this scenario. “It’s not easy for these men to come forward to share their need to objectify women’s biology sexually,” says this YouTuber. We not only get to hear the grisly details of this person’s sexual disorder and listen to him ask for our sympathy, but he brings in the sexual objectification of animals too. To his mind, this is “brain mapping” gone awry for some people, himself included. Women as human beings escape him completely. Never once is the normalization of the sexual objectification of women mentioned by any of these men. They are oblivious to the extreme. Never is porn mentioned in the equation, or the capitalist system taking the bullet train of advanced technologies that drive this normalization of females as objects across the globe like the black plague on steroids. They want their paraphilia normalized in society and understood so they don’t have to hide it. The promotion of this paraphilia by corporate culture, and now in these “poor me” confessionals of adult men, is not an accident. Whether all men pretending to be women have the fetish of autogynephilia is irrelevant, it is at the root of the gender identity industry. The fetish of objectifying female biology is driving the normalization of body dissociation. It is intensifying the objectification of females globally as we are erased in language and law to appease this paraphilia and the men who have it. I have written about the dangers of this normalization, been interviewed about it, and have reported on corporations embracing it for profit and social engineering. Other women have homed in on this as well (Sheila Jeffreys, Sue Donym, Dr. Em, and Janice Raymond come immediately to mind). This recent spate of true confessions is all part of this normalization process. Taking your eyes off the gender identity industry leviathan of body dissociation for profit for one minute, and the technology driving it, is one minute more you will spend in a fog. The gender identity industry is a multi-headed serpent, a corporate monster opening markets via the dismemberment of women. It must be slain, lest females are laid to waste. What is at stake is our social privacy, sexual privacy, cohesion, our roots as humans in sexual dimorphism, and our tether to reality. Ask yourself one last question. Are you willing to pay the price? If you would like to donate to support this work, your contributions are most welcome. Please use this link. Thank you! (Image attribution 2.0 Generic CC BY 2.0)

Gender Identity, having only entered the cultural lexicon less than a decade ago, is being advanced by global organizations in the rapid transformation of nations, language, thoughts, perceptions, institutions, and laws. The state is deconstructing material reality, toward and in hopes of, an eventual simulated reality, where we do not live in bodies tethered to the land, but in cyberspace. This is the long-arm quest of the gender identity industry (read: Big Pharma and Big Tech as they control the state). The vision of this goal has been mapped out by its founding father, a pioneering transsexual, transhumanist who is nothing, if not tenacious toward his goals. Martine Rothblatt believes that human sexual dimorphism is tantamount to South African apartheid and sits at the root of the gender identity industry as it cascades through massive and global LGBTIQI+ organizations obscuring a eugenicist movement. He has written at length about transgenderism as a road map toward transhumanism and the deconstruction of sexual dimorphism. I have addressed the corporate profiteering of the gender identity agenda in many posts and articles. I don’t often flesh out (pun intended) the narrative of the social engineering aspect, other than to say the ultimate goal is transhumanism. Transhumanism is part of an even greater quest of post-humanism. This project is being discussed all over the world, including the World Economic Forum. Consider that our finite planet cannot keep going indefinitely, under the weight of a global financial system that is laying waste to it, by most reports. It is headed for at least a parting with human civilization soon, and more likely our entire species, unless something is done. The idea of transhumanism takes on a bit more seriousness than it probably would to most people, at first glance, when considering options for species survival. Where are we going to put all the people if the earth cannot sustain us and people keep reproducing? Some must go, while an agenda of digitalizing us is brought to fruition, if the human “species” or a successor species, is to survive. Though melding us with robots is getting closer and closer, an inevitability according to the richest man in the world, we are not there yet and we are running out of planet to support the tech to get us there. How much planet is left to mine, to create the kind of energy and infrastructure to manifest this dystopian, technological religion and what will we do with the waste created in this process? The Amazon rain forest, the lungs of the earth, are quaking under pressure, and there are entire dead zones in the ocean that are so bad, the new CRISPR technology, used to alter DNA, is being used to recreate dying coral reefs. What could be a very positive development toward this goal is the sterilization of more and more young people, as they ingest wrong sex hormones and have their sex characteristics mutilated, for the profiteering of the medical-industrial complex. We now have 69 “gender expansive clinics for youth,” dotting the landscape of the US alone. The largest of those facilities is treating/sterilizing 1000 children at a time. Ten years ago, there were zero of these clinics. Young, healthy, pliant, resilient bodies are perfect specimens of surgical and medical practice for the greater and greater fusion of humans with technology and AI. This is all part of the transhumanist agenda, toward a speculative post-human existence (total disembodiment via digitalization) I know, I know, it sounds downright insane. Is it more insane than the idea, which people are mindlessly repeating, that humans can be born in the wrong bodies, that men can be women if they say they are, that sexual dimorphism in human mammals (and most species) is not real? Or that corporations, global governments, and politicians all of a sudden care about real human rights? Is it more insane than believing we must overhaul our language and laws, and all of our social institutions for a minuscule part of the population with identity issues? And why has the narrative of these individuals catapulted from people suffering from gender dysphoria to choosing to “live one’s authentic life,” as they sew themselves to the medical-industrial complex for life? We are living through a massive PsyOps (state, military, or police psychological operation), attempting to cultivate our comfortability with body dissociation (gender identity) toward more progressive avenues of disembodiment. Most people believe this is a human rights campaign, as it is stitched to the umbrella of a once real social justice movement for same-sex attracted individuals. But this is driven by state, corporate, and philanthropic money by billionaires invested in the medical-industrial complex, Big Tech, and supported by the global banking industry. All of these industries are poised to profit massively from greater and greater artificial “enhancement” of human physiology. The laws being passed globally to rid our minds of sex and replace it with gender identity are for those physiologically altered humans they are paving the way for, not the tiny percent of the population with identity issues. The now-famous robot, Sophie, has already secured citizenship in Saudi Arabia. This is why the state is promoting body dissociation as normal through consumer products and marketing, fashion, media celebration, and Hollywood. The merging of humans with robots and tech is already well underway. These developments are being discussed on TedTalks, various media platforms like Analytics Insight, Forbes, The Economist, and many others. University courses in robotic ethics and posthumanism are plentiful, as are programs in AI in general. Political debates are happening on social media platforms, but only those in academia and the elites get a say as to how this will all play out in society. It is not a democratic process in the least and our acceptance of this human merging with technology being cultivated at some fronts as a human rights movement is also being tyrannically driven by the state. In a 2016 conference/debate on whether we as citizens should trust in the potential of AI, Martine Rothblatt suggests that this process of accepting AI will be democratic, that we can trust in this because debates like the one he was engaged in will help manifest fair and good AI. But Martine Rothblatt, along with other elites, through a façade of a human rights agenda, has usurped not only the same sex attraction human rights movement of LGBs but feminism, the civil rights movement of blacks, and Intersex conditions (a disorder of sexual development) as tools for their agenda to drive the normalization of disembodiment globally through the machinations of LGBTIQ NGOs. These entities are now working as subsidiaries of the medical-industrial complex toward deconstructing material reality via sex, specifically female sex and its life-giving properties. Rothblatt and other elites want to make you believe that the corporate profiteering and the headlong rush to manifest their vision, is about corporations caring whether black people, women, individuals with intersex conditions, whether they are same-sex attracted or otherwise, should be met with respect and dignity. Corporations don’t care about anything but profits and no amount of “diversity and inclusion” jargon selling you on the idea of their concerns for us, will make it otherwise. Their concerns rest with "including" their transhuman specimens and the profits to be derived from that inclusion. This is the real "diversity" they are championing. When the corporate state is doing a hard sell on their concern for human rights, be they those of black people, those with same-sex attraction, individuals with disorders of sexual development, women, or others, you better start paying attention to what they are really trying to sell you. You cannot promote human rights, while simultaneously attempting to change laws, language, and society to support disembodiment and transhumanism. They are mutually exclusive. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you.

Transgenderism, as I have claimed so often, is a giant ad campaign by Big Pharma, getting society comportable with body dissociation, for the the elite agenda of transhumanism. It is the rebranding of transsexualism, a sexual fetish of adult men, in which men dissociate and objectify female biology as part of their fantasy. The first man to give legal structure to the normalization of this fetish of dissociation and female objectification is one who identifies as both transsexual and transhuman. I have written about Martine Rothblatt elsewhere, and his role as ideological architect of the transgender movement and its advancements toward transhumanism. It is my assertion that we are closer to this unfoldment than most of us are really comfortable contemplating. In a 2018 article in CounterPunch, Nozame Hayase, gets to the beating heart of the transgender/transhumanist corporate agenda. "In many ways," she writes, "the recent hype of “fake news” reflects this counterfeit reality that we are all surrounded by. Waves of whistleblowers in recent years revealed that we live in a kind of simulation intervened by government and corporate media propaganda." Hayase guts the illusion of democracy we are all spellbound by. Her vision is like a laser. "It is this morality rooted in our relationship to the environment that corporate culture has been trying hard to eradicate. Agendas behind transhumanist movements can be seen as the ultimate goal of transnational corporations. The rise of corporate power turned civilization against nature. Multinational agricultural biotechnology corporations like Monsanto have assaulted life by monopolizing seeds and poisoning food with GMOs. And now the corporatists have come for us, the last frontier of the natural world. Our wholly sexed beings are being deconstructed for profit. Women and children are at the front of the line. Nowhere have I seen this corporate propaganda on such blatant display as in this recent live streamed conference in Toronto, where Johnson & Johnson (J&J), a behemoth multi-national medical corporation, is selling desexing, the removal of healthy sex organs of young women, as progressive, to a very welcoming audience. Watch carefully, as two Pharma mafia king pins, use the carefully constructed corporate sales pitch (now going on globally at all major corporations simultaneously) of diversity and inclusion (D&I). In not one, but two brief introductions by two J&J "employees," amounting to eight minutes, the phrase (D&I) is used seventeen times, or roughly twice a minute. The "surgeon" (I prefer eugenicist) J&J has brought in to help sell body dissociation and female dismembering as progressive, makes a joke to the audience, which everyone embraces. After announcing he is paid by J&J to speak, he says, "I have no other disclosures." Cue: audience laughter. J&J's soldiers are selling the desexing of teens, amputating the healthy breasts of young women, as totally "normal." Their hit man, McEvenue (I cannot bare to call this man a doctor), balks that there used to be actual gatekeeping around this process. McEvenue’s patients “are not disordered in their thinking,” according to him and the crime syndicate for which he works. J&J has been supporting what has become LGBT Inc, a subsidiary of Big Pharma selling body dissociation for profit otherwise known as gender identity, for at least the past decade, along with other multi-national pharmaceutical corporations. This support is framed as (D&I). The (D&I) program is not meant to drive acceptance of diverse categories of humans (rah, rah BLM, women in the workforce, and same sex attraced individuals), but this is the sales pitch. The (D&I) sales pitch is cultivating the ground for the physically augemented humans that will be following the "gender" brigade. This is why corporations care about the identity issues of a mininscule part of the population, growing exponentially, of people who want to destroy their sex characteristics. Will this Big Pharma sales pitch go over? These mobsters know that giving double mastectomies to young women who want to pose as men, is a hard sell - “a sensitive topic," says their hit man, McEvenue, "but a fun one too, because he loves his job.” Has their propaganda thus far, taken hold? McEvenue convinces them that he may cry if he talks more about his patients. Cue: more audience laughter. This is the most soulless bunch of corporate tripe I have ever witnessed in my life and the fact people in the audience are laughing, shows just how far down the rabbit hole we have gone. To believe the mutilation of young people’s healthy sex organs, so they can appear as the opposite sex, no sex, or some made up sex, is a wonderful new miracle of medicine is to be less than human, a hypnotized drone. These men and the crime syndicate behind them, frankly, make the Italian mafia look like harmless snake oil salesman in an episode of Carnivale. J&J have created an entire department, Open & Out, within their corporate structure. to drive the madness of body dissociation for profit as normal. McEvenue, selling desexing as a “remarkable and amazing” journey also used the word inclusivity six times during his segment of the sales pitch. He likes you to think his “affirming” young people’s identity with surgical knives is normal. He used the word "normal" twice in his pitch to refer to this butchering. Remember: “It’s not a disorder at all!” (2+2=5). McEvenue works with his teacher, Dr. McClean at the McClean Clinic in Ontario, where they have perfomed, to date, six hundred of these surgeries, rising from one in 1999. Three hundred and thirty of these double mastectomies of young women’s healthy breasts were performed in 2018 alone. McEvenue is bubbly when he talks about Instagram and social media as revenue drivers that run themselves and joked about deleting negative comments. 70% of the young women he mutilates are also on testosterone. This is all framed as a human rights issue to express oneself and any negative thoughts or expressed uncomfortability by the medical community, McEvenue frames as discrimination, left over from another era. The fact these are not activists speaking here, but purportedly medical professionals, and pharmaceutical giant employees, should give anyone with a pulse, the fright of their lives, but the audience loves this staged performance, laughing and clapping in all the right places like trained seals. It took me two days to get through this video because I felt myself engulfed in flames of rage each time I tried to watch it. “This is the future,” McEvenue states, discussing the McClean training program for other surgeons. “There is no way the McClean Clinic will be able to do two million surgeries (Is that salivating drool I see at the corners of his mouth?)." This is his estimate of people that "fall between the binary of male and female" in Canada. “Some of these individuals” he explains, “have gender dysphoria, others have chest dysphoria and still others just want a more masculine appearance. It is all part of a spectrum of gender expression,” he claims, “that has a biological component (this brazen lie is later repeated by his mafia boss)." McEvenue even attends Pride Parade to show support for his patients. One hand washes the other in this corporate orgy of cash covered in the blood of young, mutilated flesh. To make sure their Pride, Pharma, future under a rainbow banner is a success, McEvenue and J&J roll out a mother/daughter (remade into a mock man) team to solidify their (D&I) sales pitch. After personal stories by mother and daughter, that sound like a repeat of every other difficult but triumphant family story we've heard endlessly over the last eight years, of a young person who wants to destroy their sex characteristics and the family drama surrounding the announcement, mom rolls out the suicide trope. You’ve heard this one too. “ I’d rather stand beside my child, than on top of their grave.” Sniff, sniff…..wipes tear from eye…..and McEvenue, unleashes a suicide statistic for young people wanting to destroy their sex organs that is 50% higher than that of the general population. The audience gorges on these lies. McEvenue "really likes to keep his presentations positive," but he couldn't resist highlighting and solidifying that statistic in the minds of the audience. We have hit full-monty cannibal-stage capitalism and are now consuming ourselves. We are the last frontier of the natural world and if we don't stand up now, unified, as humanity, it is over. If this J&J audience is not also staged, another propaganda simulation, I don’t want to know about it because I might lose the will to live. Sharing a species with these people makes me feel humiliation for being part of the human race. Then again, it seems like that problem won’t be around much longer - not if the future McEvenue and his crime syndicate backers forsee, and are helping to forge, have anything to do with it. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

I know how human atrocities were carried out in history while people's neighbors remained silent. I know this because I am living through the era of Gender Tyranny where a lobby group of elite and powerful men have captured organizations, institutions, whole governments and bought the silence of the populace, along with public support for the most outrageous lies. They have done so while children are being castrated and maimed and their maiming and castration is being used as fodder for national entertainment. Each new day, I ask what it will take to break through. What do others who aren’t fighting need to see, to know, to have happen before they see this is corporate totalitarianism, consider where it is going, and act accordingly? So many of us fighting have loved ones and friends going along with this. It is blowing our minds, tearing us up; how do we continue our relationships with people who refuse to see the harm in front of their faces? Many professionals have now been openly fired for making critical references to the gender identity industry publicly or for comments made on social media. Comedians, professors, authors, cartoonists, teachers, journalists, artists, political commentators, actors, activists, and others have been overtly censored, and shut down for questioning t is happening. Lawsuits are looming that are being reported on in the general public, of parents losing their children - LOSING THEIR CHILDREN -for refusing to believe in gender ideology, losing campaigns against their children’s school when the schools are hiding their children’s new identity from them. Before parents are even aware of what “gender identity” is, or that their children will be clamoring for wrong sex hormones, before they have even recovered from the shock that their child is identifying as the opposite sex, they are blindsided by the capitulation of the children’s schools, indoctrinated by political lobby groups. Each new day, I ask what it will take to break through. What do others who aren’t fighting need to see, to know, to have happen to them, to have happen to others, before they see this is corporate totalitarianism, consider where it is going, and act accordingly? So many of us fighting have loved ones and friends going along with this. It is blowing our minds, tearing us up, how do we continue our relationships with people who refuse to see the harm in front of their faces?octrine. Young adults are getting the wrong sex hormones for their bodies after a couple of visits to Planned Parenthood and their school campuses. Over 40,000 young women campaign for money on GoFundMe to have their healthy breasts amputated so they can “identify as men." What will it take? Children are being overtly sexualized in public areas and at their schools under the guise of “diversity and inclusion,” a trans lobby mantra that frames this strange new discourse and the force used to implement it, without irony, as anti-bullying programs that parents can’t opt-out of. I want people to ask, what kind of human rights movement acts like this? I want them to ask it out loud, in conversations, at their jobs, and everywhere they go. I especially want them to have the courage to address the people claiming to love them. Is it a human right to dissociate physically? Where will we be in ten years if we don’t stop lying? The boundaries of all women's and children’s safe spaces are being breached, to include men and boys. The sex boundary between males and females is being violated. Crime statistics are being skewed, medical information ignored, and women with their healthy breasts amputated are being openly used in advertising, on runways, and in fashion spreads. Young adults seeking to change their sex characteristics and pursuing a medical nightmare are used in advertising. This is going on in the public sphere. None of this is hidden. Men claiming womanhood to sate their sexual fetish are being thrust into the limelight at corporations, banks, Hollywood, and the government. One of them was just elected to be the nation’s health secretary. Women’s professional sports are being ruined by men claiming womanhood, stealing their titles and their scholarship opportunities, and have just been supported in doing so by our new president. Men are assaulting women in women’s prisons. The silent majority is silent still. This has been going on for eight solid years. By comparison, McCarthyism reached its peak and began its decline during the “McCarthy hearings”: 36 days of televised investigative hearings led by McCarthy in 1954. McCarthyism was segregated to America. It was not a global phenomenon. Gender Tyranny has been on a worldwide rampage across America, Europe, Australia, and Canada and is now being driven into the global south under a banner of liberation. We have had eight years of bald-faced lies about the most intrinsic thing to being human - our sex. Everyone knows changing sex is a lie. Even if they aren’t facing it, like the alcoholic in denial, they know it. We cannot bear more, nor can we tolerate the lies any longer, even from those we love. We must demand more. Their silence is nutrition, feeding gender tyranny perpetuation across the globe. These “friends,” those who “love us,” those who “care about” others, nodding their heads at overt propaganda, normalizing these harms as the bodies pile up, must be addressed, their silence no longer excused, their “love” called to task. For what is love without action? What does it mean to love while these harms are mounting all around us, with the heads of those we love nodding up and down like bobblehead dolls? We must demand more from those claiming to love us, that their love is put into action. The time for educating, patience, for averted conversations for the sake of comfort or concerning false family unity must come to an end if we are to grab our humanity back from Gender Tyranny. Because this is how it happened, how tyranny reigned in Nazi Germany. It wasn’t the Nazis themselves that cemented their success. It was the silence and inaction of those on the side, their unwillingness to tell the truth. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

Examining the Instagram account of TomBoyX underwear and Vogue model, Chellaman, a young woman who has had her healthy breasts amputated to express a “non-binary identity,” I can feel the allure of beautiful, young faces, clever performance, talented photography, fashion, color and style as the photos coalesce into corporately stylized glamour. The allure, for me, though I am an artist and appreciate fashion, is unexpected. The images are nothing like the surgery scars on the young women I’m used to seeing, who’ve just undergone this barbaric surgery to amputate healthy immature sex organs. Those pictures tell the truth about unnecessary surgeries. Chellaman’s modeling photos are selling a fantasy, the glamorization of body dissociation. How can young people resist body dissociation displayed as fashion if I, fully aware of and writing to expose the tragedies of the gender identity industry, can get momentarily sucked in by the deliberate corporate cultivation of desire and beauty made out of the unnecessary amputation of healthy sex organs? I teeter on the edge of this kafkaesque ledge. Chellaman’s message is one of self-definition overriding biological reality, a message of empowerment, designing the self with drugs and amputations that serve the medical-industrial complex and somehow, we are all to consider this a human rights movement. Chellaman, an Instagram influencer and YouTuber with a manufactured sex identity, has come a long way since her TomBoyX modeling days. She has been featured in Instinct Magazine and Vogue, Cosmopolitan, Popsugar, and other fashion spreads, walked NYC Fashion week runway, posed for Gay Times UK and Calvin Klein (another fashion house celebrating body dissociation as progressive), had her own Tedx Talk, and is looking toward her first television role In season two of the live-action adaption of Teen Titans. How do parents fight the onslaught of these advertising campaigns targeting their children when attempting to discuss the realities of corporately cultivated identity medicine and the life-long consequences and complications of making such decisions? Why are so many people refusing to resist these corporate messages? A decade ago, the normalization of adults transgressing their sex, with modern medicine and technology, was well underway via media presentations and Hollywood. But the trend of glamorizing medical identities was not yet in its zenith. Six years ago, the narrative of the "transgender child," had only just emerged on the cultural landscape. Suddenly, children born in the wrong sexed body seemed everywhere and were marketed as having the terrible condition of gender dysphoria that needed treatment, clinics, specialized medicine, surgeons, and above all, compassion. Gender clinics for youth proliferated across the American landscape, along with the advancements of "trans" identified characters in the media, and children presenting to "gender" clinics rose exponentially. The "poor transgender child" emerged alongside a sudden glamorization of adult "transitioning." The shift from a terrible disorder of body dysmorphia to celebrating adults and children using drugs and surgeries to de-sex their bodies as progressive, trendy, and cool has been swift and penetrating. The glamorization of de-sexing young women, in particular, has initiated clever t-shirt campaigns and online apparel stores selling body dissociation as fashion accessories. How do those of us fighting the normalization of body dissociation compete with an industry that allows for this glamorization of dismemberment? It breaks my heart that young people are being sucked into this madness, but what entirely unhinges me is that corporations are getting away with selling it to them. Underwear, sneakers, shaving products, menstrual products, and fashion are being sold with the dismembered bodies of society's youth (or the mock dismemberment in some instances), promoting liberation, sterilization and de-sexing while wrapping them in the chains of the medical-industrial complex. The recording industry is capitalizing on the glamour of body dissociation with Music videos selling false transformations that obscure the horror being done to young bodies with a lifetime sewn to Big Pharma. Aviccii’s Silhouettes has had nearly a billion views on youtube. Avicii Lyrics for Silhouettes Press play, fast forward Nonstop, we have a beaten path before us It was all there, in plain sight Come on people, we have all seen the signs So we will never get back to To the old school To the old grounds, it's all about the newfound We are the newborn, the world knew all about us (We are the future and we're here to stay) We've come a long way since that day And we will never look back at the faded silhouette We've come a long way since that day And we will never look back, look back at the faded silhouette Straight ahead on the path we have before us Day by day, soon the change will come Don't you know we took a big step forward Just lead the way and we pull the trigger And we will never get back to To the old school To the old grounds, it's all about the newfound We are the newborn, the world knew all about us (We are the future and we're here to stay) We've come a long way since that day And we will never look back at the faded silhouette We've come a long way since that day (that day...) We've come a long way since that day And we will never look back, at the faded silhouette We've come a long way since that day And we will never look back, look back, at the faded silhouette Have all the adults left the room? How can we allow corporations to sell this to our children, to swallow their wholeness with the promise of a transformation that can not only never materialize but is insane, lifting them out of their roots in their sexed bodies and promoting a new horizon of humanity separate from sex and biology? As the voice of Avicii trails off in the song about fading silhouettes, “We are the newborn, we are the future, and we’re here to stay,” the only thing I see fading is a future of wholeness for our youth and the debris of body parts and bloody surgical implements left behind on some operating table before our youth are even marginally aware of the power of corporations selling false dreams. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

I have been asked often over the years why so many same-sex attracted individuals support their own erasure, via the addition of a disembodying ideology (Trans) to the LGB corporate banner. There is currently a little movement underway of same-sex attracted individuals to re-center their own rights. They are aware of the cognitive dissonance of having a sex-denying ideology positioned within their movement for acceptance of same-sex attraction. The corporate deconstruction of sex into a spectrum of profitable identities is being used to obscure the reality of human sexual dimorphism. This conceals same-sex attraction while simultaneously framing it as bigotry against body dissociation. But why don’t the majority of LGBs get it? How can the gay men (and some women) at the very pinnacle of the LGBT juggernaut, like Jon Stryker, Tim Gill, Drummond Pike, David Bohnett, Mark S. Bonham, and Beth Brooke Marciniak just overlook the harms being manifest against gender non-conforming children and women? My sense is we are underestimating the unconscious shame fomented and carried over from an early, blatant, and rampant homophobia in western cultures. This shaming has manifested an almost maniacal compulsion for power over others. Katherine Ramsland, a forensic psychologist, has examined shame concerning serial killers and how this fuels their compulsion to regain dominance over early childhood experiences of being humiliated. It might seem odd to compare gay men, with a penchant for power, to serial killers. Still, it resonates for me when I consider the deep levels of shaming done to gay men when they are children (there is no counterpart to the previously culturally accepted female tomboy for effeminate boys) and how so many of them having gained political dominance are currently running roughshod over any semblance of democracy. They exhibit an inability to listen to others, to understand alternate perspectives, and to work with others who do not conform to the narrative being sold by the gender identity industry. The LGBT NGOs run by gay men are driving punishing assaults against any person, state, or institution who gets in the way of their profiteering, their power, and their introduction of an insane body-denying ideology into the culture. This ideology is, in essence, dismembering humanity. Gay men are throwing potentially gay children under the medical-industrial complex bus for their fetishistic brethren. As usual, some lesbians follow their lead, hoping the power spoils will be shared. This has certainly been true for some lesbians. Sheila Jeffreys, a lesbian feminist scholar who analyses the history and politics of human sexuality, has argued that this attachment of gay men to men with a fetish of disembodiment, is predominantly an issue of men prioritizing male sexual gratification over everything. I believe there is more to it than this. I think it also goes beyond profiteering, which I have written about extensively. Once the AIDS crisis was minimized in the US, a generation of young gay men, previously brutally bullied for their effeminacy and/or their same-sex attraction as boys, growing up in homophobic societies, suddenly found themselves with some social currency. Between the investment of the medical-industrial complex in their same-sex attraction as a medical issue and corporate identity, they were no longer marginalized to the outskirts of society. This confluence of AIDS and their political activism gave them power as a group that brought inroads into the larger heterosexual community. These inroads didn't happen quite the same way for lesbians. Lesbians, as women, didn’t have the social power men had, and they weren’t the ones who got sick. They were not the ones society stigmatized for spreading a deadly virus into the culture. Political solidarity against common oppression can be as strong a bond as any deep friendship or romance. Effeminate gay men seeking transition to avoid the humiliation of living in a homophobic culture didn’t look all that different than those with autogynephilia, a sexual obsession with possessing female biology. Little do many gay men and women understand the grave mistake in conflating paraphilia with same-sex desire, one based in sexual embodiment and the other in sexual disassociation. Gay corporatists explicitly created an alliance with transsexuals for profit, but the glue in their allegiance has also been entrenched in solidarity against heteronormativity and shame. LGB individuals cling to their fetishistic siblings over other friendships and family, even as gender ideology seeks to erase them. Where the social advantages fought for by gay men and lesbians but secured by gay men and trickled down to lesbians, most lesbians established social communities, opened bookstores, and created concerts and cruises for other lesbians. Gay men, having amassed more power, entered the corporate culture, banking, politics, and technology, where their influence and acceptance of their sexual orientation were magnified in direct relation to their financial and political power. Suddenly there was a way through the humiliation of being othered. Tim Gill, the largest individual funder of LGBT causes in the US, and founder of the Gill Foundation, one of the most prominent LGBT NGOs, gave voice to this newfound power in 1992. Just before founding the Gill Foundation, Gill called Norwest Bank Colorado, which held about $20 million of his technology company’s cash and Gill’s wealth. He wanted to know if the bank’s gay employees were protected by an internal policy. They were not. Gill threatened: If Norwest didn’t get a nondiscrimination policy on the books, he’d withdraw all $20 million. Within weeks, the bank complied, and then 39-year-old Gill realized his wealth could influence more than technology markets. It seems reasonable that this sudden access to incredible power after being socially shamed as a young person for something so intimate as one’s sexual orientation would have a substantial impact. Gill befriended Jon Stryker, another gay male, in their alliance against heteronormativity (read: sexual dimorphism). Stryker created Arcus Foundation, a global LGBT NGO Goliath, within a few years of Gill creating his LGBT NGO. Stryker grew up in the same overtly homophobic era as Gill. In his opening introduction for Jon Stryker at the 2015 GLSEN Respect Awards, Gill commented that since knowing each other, he and Jon have “plotted, schemed, hiked and skied together” while also “punishing the wicked and rewarding the good.” “Punishing the wicked” is odd phraseology for successful political activism. It seems overly vengeful. Two young gay boys born into the entrenched homophobia of 1950s America, with all the internalized shame, undoubted bullying, and secrecy that must have entailed, were finally able to show the enemy who was boss. There have been few lesbians garnering this much corporate power, though there are some exceptions. Because they are so few, they are perhaps even more conditioned to keeping an alliance of power with their gay brothers and, increasingly, their fetishistic comrades. Some lesbians still sew themselves, politically, to gay men for the same reasons straight women sew themselves to straight men. It’s where the power, protection, and money are. It’s easy to see how a shared trauma around sexual humiliation has created a bond between many LGBs to each other and men with a fetish for objectifying female biology. As many LGBs project their struggle for sexual acceptance onto autogynephilic men, they create for themselves a blind spot for the destruction now being manifested by their entrenched alliance. Unfortunately, the gender identity industry will unmoor these lesbian and gay men from their sexed roots, along with the rest of us. Understanding how homophobic shaming has created social tyrants of some gay men may help toward unwinding our support for the sexual objectification of others and body dissociation. This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you. Image by Gan Khoon Lay In the Illegal Money Laundering Crime Collection

“TERF,” the acronym for trans-exclusionary-radical-feminist, is a slur used to vilify the women and men standing between the gender identity industry and our wholly sexed human bodies. Transgenderism, the corporate rebranding of the fetish of transsexualism, is selling us body dissociation and the colonization of female biology, for-profit, as normal. Not just normal, but progressive, cool, edgy, and illuminating. The rollout of this rebranding in the culture, less than ten years ago, has been a blitzkrieg on our emotions, selling us a standardized narrative around a very unstable and illogical ideology, having no base in scientific or biological reality. The cultivation of compassion, being sown by our technologically enhanced propaganda apparatus, are what standardizes the narrative: “The poor” trans child trapped in the wrong body. “The poor” family that has to face the hurdle of having a trans child in a non-accepting society, complete with Hallmark cards. “The poor” adolescents who will kill themselves without wrong sex hormones, surgeries, and a lifetime tethered to the medical-industrial complex. “The poor,” black, transwomen murdered in droves. “The poor” trans person without a love life because no one wants to date them and simultaneously the hateful character of anyone not embracing this ad campaign. An ad campaign is something a business spends money on in advance of projected and hoped for sales and this is why the message of body dissociation is being driven, just like any ad, over and over and over again, in the media, in Hollywood, in schools and universities, in fashion and the arts, via transgenderism. Everywhere we go, there is the standard trans narrative. But transgender is not the product being sold. Though profits are rising for mutilating surgeries on healthy sex organs, transgender is only the ad campaign, lubricating us for the great corporate fuck (unfortunately, I mean that very literally). The object for sale in the gender identity industry is female biology, just the same as it is the object in the fetish of autogynephilia. Transgenderism is the vehicle to get us there - to accept body dissociation and the colonization of females as progressive. Women who understand what is happening here must be villainized, cut off at the pass before they get too much attention. It isn’t personal. It’s profiteering. “TERF” as a construct is part of a political, corporate campaign to get us to accept our own disenfranchisement from our sexed roots. Women’s biology has been exploited, in our capitalist system, for unpaid labor, for the sexual gratification and profit of men through prostitution and pornography, and with the advancements of technology, as rented wombs, in the surrogacy industry. The promotion of body dissociation via autogynephilia & its corporate rebranding to transgenderism is done with an eye toward total technological control of women’s reproductive capacities and human sexual wholeness reduced to parts: eggs, sperm, wombs, vaginas, phalluses, breasts, uteruses, synthetic breast milk, synthetic blood, etc. Research is already being contemplated and the propaganda being rolled out to provide wombs and uteruses for men and the invention of a complete external womb. If there is a future where women are not needed for reproduction, it looks like they are clearing the path. If female bodies are not needed, then the biological boundary between men and women is no longer needed. Sexual dimorphism is not needed. We can all live on a spectrum of sexual identity (for sexual gratification) but no longer will we be wedded to sex for procreation - with the advent of sex robots we won’t necessarily be needing the act of sex with each other, for physical gratification, either. This is corporate, technological colonization of human sex. Once the boundary of the sexes is violated, our DNA and our genetic coding are up for corporate grabs. Listen to Petra De Sutter, another man claiming womanhood for himself, discuss the most recent advancements of the CRISPR technology and allow yourself to contemplate the little hairs that will undoubtedly raise on the back of your neck if you haven’t completely succumbed to the corporate gulag in which we live. Women are literally being socially phased out of language, especially that having to do with our particular biology, all under a guise of inclusivity and diversity. Diversity and inclusion sound nice in theory but is actually corporate-speak for splitting us all into further fragments - parts for consuming, in a word: dissociation. Men are fantasizing about their own pregnancies and menstruation, while women are being renamed as menstruators and chest feeders. Just as transgenderism is cultivating our acceptance of body dissociation and the complete objectification of female biology, “TERF” is selling us a foe to vanquish, so we don’t look up at the profiteers. It's the oldest trick in the book and we still don't recognize it when we see it: divide and conquer. The emotional appeals are just as important at this front, to keep our eyes off the elites with an agenda and focused on the foe standing in the way of our corporately staged, fictitious liberation through gender identity. “These women are bigots.” “They are angry.” “They are violent.” “They are hateful (the same was said of the feminists attempting to stand between the pornography industry and the women being harmed by it - and look where we are now). “ If actual feminists, radical or otherwise, exclude anything, it is the notion that this fetish of autogynephilia, is harmless, especially as it is further normalized in society by men who have the fetish, who are growing in number with its normalization, infiltrating all sectors of society in order to drive it further into our lives - or more accurately, against our lives. This fetish, taken to its zenith is literally dismembering us and our children, while we are told repeatedly that it is not happening. You better believe feminists are angry, and we are going to stay that way until the normalization of this fetish of dissociation and objectification of women's bodies has been stopped. We will not be gaslit. We will not stop speaking, writing, organizing, raging, fighting, and protecting our sisters and our children. The corporate state can have our sex when it pries it loose from our cold, dead fingers. We will fight this to the death. We now have many men by our side who also understand what is happening here and are fighting for the lives and bodies of their children. We are growing stronger as this agenda makes itself more obvious. We are on the political right and the political left. We are Christian, Muslim, Jewish, atheist, black, brown, white, single, married, parents, child-free, teachers, doctors, journalists, cartoonists, comedians, and artists, but foremost, we are wholly sexed humans. We are aligning for our life, for our humanity, and for the life and humanity of our children against the gender identity industry. We will not stand down. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you. (Header: File: Belgrade Pride 2019 - STOP TERF.jpg)

In the past two decades, the social accommodation for men with the sexual fetish (paraphilia) of transsexualism, known clinically as autogynephilia, has been gaining traction under the corporate rebranding to transgenderism. Not only that but the normalization is being cultivated within our cultures, framed as progressive by Hollywood, politicians, governments, global corporations, and driven by NGOs specifically constructed to normalize it. It is time we started paying closer attention to this particular aspect of the corporate coup that is the gender identity industry. Industry is the operative word here. Capitalizing on a fetish that objectifies female biology is where the origins of the gender identity industry begin, not in identity or gender (systematized sex-based stereotypes). We are being commoditized and controlled through the normalization of this paraphilia. The greatest threat of autogynephilic men, on the whole, is not that they are or are not predatory as individuals. They are no more or less predatory than other men. They’re men and many men are dangerous to women and girls. Opening female spaces and sports to men is absurd and dangerous but the greater risk and the one being ignored, for the most part, is in the social normalization of this fetish objectifying female biology, being cultivated as liberation and framed as identity. Fetishes are compulsory, obsessive and they generally escalate. They are usually focused on objects. The “object” in the fetish of autogynephilia is female biology which is what makes it perilous, especially when it is wedded to capitalism and technology. Men having this fantasy in their bedroom is bad enough. Men with this fetish being allowed to invade female spaces is abusive. Men sitting on corporate boards, passing laws, governing countries, that see women’s biology as parts to be colonized and commoditized are terrifying and men that get off on this colonization and commoditization should be enough to keep all of us awake at night and thinking about ways to stop this. Autogynephiles generally escalate from cross-dressing in their bedrooms to cross-dressing in public, for sexual gratification. Fifty years ago, this rarely escalated to men appropriating female biology via pharma and tech. First, it wasn’t socially acceptable to do so and the technology rarely enabled men to hide their publicly displayed fetish. That has changed. Now, acceptance of this fetishizing of female biology for sexual gratification is being demanded by elites forcing it into the culture. Young people are adopting it as a fad and injuring themselves for the profiteering of the corporations driving the fetish. Where the acceptance of this leads, is to our participation in sexual role-play in public and the normalizing of sex that is purportedly only in the fantasies of the fetishists (no harm in fantasy, right?) who dream of women as parts. But this fantasy is not just in the minds of the men with this paraphilia. These parts, our human sex characteristics, are literally being commoditized. We are now presented with autogynephilic men in the boardrooms of corporations and are forced to use pronouns that conflict with reality “for their safety,” so that they can perform their fetishistic ritual of dismembering us for corporate profit. Of note, though it is being normalized for women to appropriate male biology and this is also wrong, this is not a fetish for women. None of this has anything to do with self-expression. It is corporate-driven profiteering by Big Pharma and Big Tech and supported by corporate culture, the global banking industries, and human rights organizations. Private Versus Public It is not prudish or sex-negative to want sex to be private. It is a desire to live in communities where other people's sex acts aren't thrust upon us. Why? Because we want to choose with whom and when we want to be intimate. This is why we still have (for now) intimate realms, private lives, and public ones. This normalization of sex, disconnected from our private lives and made public, forces us to be observers, participants in other’s sex lives. It invades our expectations of privacy when we are used as pawns of validation for public displays of fetish. This breaching of our right to privacy from other’s sex role-play goes hand in hand with our being surveilled everywhere we go and the constant collection of our data. Forcing sex on people is abusive, a means of controlling them, destabilizing them, as is constant surveillance which we are living concurrently, both being more and more normalized by corporate culture and the manipulation of society. The normalization of the paraphilia of transsexualism, via transgenderism, making it a human right to sexually objectify women’s biology publicly, for sexual gratification, forces people to lie that this force is happening, that this control is being exerted over women and others, to abuse them, control them and destabilize them, just like hidden cameras, in plain sight, everywhere we go. With autogynephilia being framed as a human right, via transgenderism, men with this fetish are being encouraged to come forward while embodying their fantasies at work, in corporations, in institutions, and in politics. The embodiment of their fantasy is the disembodiment of females. Others are being pressured to accept this fetish, with pronoun use and allyship being forced at the corporate and institutional levels. These men are then passing laws to validate this sexual abuse of the rest of the people in society, including children, learning about "transgenderism," under a guise of acceptance, in their grade schools. A common feature of sexual abuse survivors is their instinct to dissociate for survival. Pay attention. We are being corporately groomed for greater levels of dissociation. It is not an aside that there is a powerful, rich man at the seat of the gender identity industry, with this female objectifying paraphilia, calling for the erasure of the sex boundary between men and women, which will turn our bodies into corporate commodities. Martine Rothblatt has so objectified his own wife that he has made her into a literal robot whose consciousness HE is creating, to everyone’s amazement and fascination. He, along with other rich, powerful men with this paraphilia, is driving the normalization of his fetish under a human rights umbrella for corporate profiteering. We have headed off a capitalist cliff. Our bodies are being opened to corporate colonization in a way that has not happened before. Transgenderism is also potentially the last vestige of our privacy as citizens as we are surveilled in everything we do, and other people’s fetishes become part of the social fabric where all of us are forced into one big sexual, role-play psychodrama. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you. (Image attribution: ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The severity of censorship being meted out to speakers and professors in universities, comedians doing comedy, ordinary people having opinions at their jobs, authors writing books, actors taking acting jobs and cartoonists making cartoons, etc is escalating, especially as regards anything having to do with the new corporatized additions to the LGB umbrella. Are we underestimating the severity of what is going on here? I worry about this when I hear journalists and others using terms like “cancel culture” and “wokeness” as snide rebuttals to what is a rapid downward spiral of our speech as it circles the drain. John Zmirak was brazen to ask the right questions in The Stream yesterday, (he can still do this) in confronting the recent and boldly stupid announcement, by mainstream media, that the actress Ellen Page is now a man. He asks, "Does Transgenderism’ Even Mean Anything? Or Is It Just Incoherent Madness? What are you choosing, exactly? If you’re not making dangerous, destructive efforts to mutilate your body, what are you doing? What are you identifying with, or as, and how?" Zmirak’s speculations in the piece are both funny and snide and made me laugh and cheer him on inside my own head. Too many others are not getting away with this. He closed strongly with the observation, “A society that can force us to say that Bruce Jenner is a woman and Ellen Page is a man can force us to say anything at all” and “it’s literal, textbook madness to remake our words for the whole human species to cater to sad delusions.” I was clapping, alone in my living room, by his point in his article. His last line was a home run too: “I won’t do it, no Xir, and neither should you.” It’s a strong close and rifts on the media attempts to get us to go along with this charade. But I really want to know how John Zmirak proposes he is going to get away with eventually not going along. How are any of us going to resist this juggernaut if we all don’t start screaming from the rooftops and talking about this even if it makes us uncomfortable? Will silence save us? Has it worked before? These are questions every single one of us better start contemplating soon. After years of digging into the funding behind transactivism, the gender identity industry, its elite underpinnings and political infrastructure, and more importantly its steady infiltration of the marketplace, I can see very concretely how they are going to get all of us, every last one of us, to speak lies. The funding by billionaire philanthropists such as Jennifer Pritzker, Jon Stryker, Tim Gill, and others, driving the ridiculous notion of “gender identity” institutionally has been magnificent in scope. The political infrastructure for this was established well in advance of trans madness hitting the culture and that preparation has proved successful. People now believe that surgically engineering our bodies to conform to an idea of ourselves beyond our biological sex is progress, that giving puberty blockers to children and handing out wrong sex hormones to young adults is the height of positive development. What strikes me most though, what terrifies me is not that too many people believe this and it is hard to get them not to believe it. It isn’t even that it has been driven into our institutions. This could be unraveled, the same way it was built. What completely unhinges me is that this has been driven into the global market. The medical industry, global corporations, and banks, such as Goldman Sachs, Barclays, HSBC, E&Y are all changing their corporations to accept and drive the lie into language and law that we are not a sexually dimorphic species. They are making participation in their corporations as employees contingent on accepting the lie. The alternative is being fired for bigotry and hate. They have training meetings, not unlike the indoctrination of school children by the new sex curriculums added to their lessons, recruiting memos, and meetings, as have been set up in children's schools, to rearrange thoughts and communications with and about each other that are homogenous, serve their corporate goals and force them to lie. Hollywood is, well, Hollywood. Institutions and politicians can still be negotiated with, laws can be changed – one was just changed in the UK to the great benefit of children. But corporations are profit-seeking missiles. They don’t think. They are designed to profit. The market moves of its own accord. It is an engine. It is totalitarian. It has nearly devoured an entire globe and now It has come for human sex – the boundary between male and female. Where Zmirak ‘s piece goes wrong, it goes terribly wrong in underestimating his target. He suggests “Our elites are forcing us to repeat such blatant nonsense for only one reason: to flex their muscles, test their power, and prove that they can.” NO, they aren’t. They are doing so for control, for social engineering, and for-profit, and the sooner we understand it is an organized, brilliant strategy which is procuring all that for them, the better position we will be in to resist this “wokeism” which is really not “wokeism” at all, but totalitarianism in a dress and pearls, a fascistic market, sewn to Big Tech and Big Pharma moving at lightning speed. If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you.