Constructing The Legal Lie Of The Transgender Child - Part II

Updated: Jan 26

In my last post, I speculated about why Dentons, the largest law firm in the world, and Reuters, a media, corporate tax, and law conglomerate are interested in constructing (For Free!) the legal lie of “transgender children.” 

In an effort to find answers to anything, my MO is to always #FollowTheMoney.  Let’s follow the money trail back from ILGYO, the small LGBT NGO for which Dentons and Reuters collaborated on a guide.

ILGYO is part of the Transgender Europe network, the largest funding and political apparatus driving the normalization and depathologizing of transgenderism in Europe. It consists of 129 member organizations across Europe and Central Asia in 44 different countries.  TGEU is in turn funded hundreds of thousands of dollars by Arcus Foundation, one of the two largest LGBT NGOs in America, whose founder funds his foundation from the profits of his medical supply corporation.  So we have a medical corporation worth over 13 billion dollars, whose heir is funding the normalization of transgender children from his own medical fortune.  Arcus supports myriad programs across the globe, to drive the idea that children can be the opposite sex, such as Gender Spectrum and GLSEN (whose founder, Kevin Jennings, was brought to Arcus in 2012 as Executive Director). This pattern is being repeated by other corporatists with heavy investments in Big Pharma, such as George Soros, who has substantial stock in CVS, Johnson & Johnson, and other medical/pharma corporations.  Soros’ Open Society Foundation is working to construct, along with Arcus and TGEU, the idea that children being medicalized for life is just another way to be human.  This new way to be human, for children being funneled into youth “gender clinics,” involves dangerous drugs and medical procedures that assist them in hiding the fact they are either biologically male or female. In 2013, Arcus Foundation brought over Adrian Coman from Soros' Open Society as the Director of their Human Rights department. Warren Buffet is another billionaire with substantial stock, along with Soros, in CVS.  He too owns stock in Johnson & Johnson (61 million shares).  Buffet has provided enormous funding to his offspring"s NGO, serving the LGBT Gender Identity narrative, in collaboration with Arcus Foundation.  

And what is this “gender recognition” for youth, being constructed by those invested in the medical industry exactly?  We do not have a clear, legal definition of gender identity that is not tautological.  The Yogyakarta Principles + !0, is the document on the application of international human rights law which initiated gender identity as a legal concept.  It has been driven with money from Arcus Foundation through our political structures and provides the definition of gender identity as “each person's deeply felt internal and individual experience of gender.” Aren’t we really talking about biological sex?  Biological sex seems to be what is deconstructed in the global push to change the definition of female to include male, which deconstructs sex as a meaningful definition.  The erasure of sex on birth certificates, passports, medical reports, crime reports, and even credit cards is about the deconstruction of sexual dimorphism.  The inclusion of men in women’s safe houses and sports, under the guise that they identify as female, is a denial of biological sex. 

What we can see in this trajectory is a clear money trail from the pharmaceutical lobby to the construction of a legal lie that supports, newly constructed medical identities that override biology.  Biological reality is being legally queered, it would appear, to pave the way for more and more complex changes to human biology, and children’s bodies are being used as the fodder for this experiment. This experiment is being run by the richest, global corporatists who naturally use the largest and richest legal structures (Dentons and Reuters) to construct their lie. The laws being constructed are not to protect people who wish to express themselves differently than gender stereotypes allow, but to legalize changes to human biology.

See part I of this blog post here. Note: see other blog posts on Dentons’ work in constructing the legal lie of the transgender child. 1. 2. 3.

If you like what you are reading at the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription to support this research. Thank you.