The artificial sex characteristics of the gender industry are not real. They are products in a developing medical-tech market. They do not inherently alter the individuals who acquire them or endow them with any special human attributes. Instead, they primarily influence our perception of reality, serving the profit-driven agenda of the industry.
Although still in its infancy, the industry focused on self-actualized sex through commodification is experiencing rapid growth. It is imperative that we grasp the nature of this situation to avoid being drawn into the constructed virtual reality it seeks to impose upon us. We must question whether we want to inhabit a manufactured environment where individuals are reduced to commodities and reproduction is facilitated through medical technology, or as part of the natural world. How far is too far, in experimenting with the line between reality and technologically constructed humans?
Many individuals hesitate to speak honestly about the gender industry, fearing misunderstanding or accusations of bigotry. But it’s important to recognize bigotry applies to people, not commercial products. Presently, there exists confusion where the products of the synthetic sex market—the artificially constructed sex characteristics of the gender industry —are mistaken for the individuals who purchase them. This confusion is escalating as people try to navigate a marketing campaign of human rights designated for commodities. We are in dangerous territory when humanity is being reduced to commodities and commodities are being given human rights.
Humanity is being blurred intentionally for a virtual construct - beings beyond our currently sexed borders. The gender industry is not the only arena where this blurring of reality is happening, but sex is foundational to our existence as a species, which makes it crucial for people to understand what is transpiring. We must get beyond our fear of talking about this industry in real terms, instead of the language the market has set with its advertising slogans. “Trans rights are human rights,” is a slogan that infers the commodities of artificial sex characteristics, are people. They are not.
This confusion is not an accident. It is a deliberate strategy of the ad for synthetic sex. Artificial sex characteristics, crafted through medical technology, are being promoted under the guise of human rights advocacy precisely because it blurs the lines between the products of the gender industry and the people who purchase the products. This branding aims to convey a sense of uniqueness and transformation to consumers.
All marketing works in this way. The ad campaign signals to the world, the place of the consumer of the product, in society, and cultivates the perceptions of others through advertising. A woman driving a Mercedes Benz is bound to get a very different welcome at valet parking, than the woman driving a Ford. The brand of car doesn’t change anything fundamental about her. It creates an illusion that she is a more worthy individual because she can afford a Mercedes Benz in a society that values wealth over human integrity.
The artificial sex characteristics of the medical-tech industry are no different.
The gender industry operates by deconstructing reproductive sex and commodifying its components, including eggs, sperm, wombs, synthetic hormones, breasts, penises, and vaginas. Children are increasingly exposed to gender ideology in their schools and other learning environments, and on their social media where they spend many more hours than previous generations. They are encouraged to view themselves as commodities rather than wholly, sexed beings. This indoctrination, coupled with exposure to explicit sexual material, contributes to the dissociation from their innate biological reality.
Efforts to challenge the destructiveness of the gender industry often become mired in debates about fairness, surrounding identities pertaining to sex and societal roles, detracting from the underlying economic motivations.
Institutions, governments, and corporations invest in this industry for its profitability, viewing individuals not as complete human beings but as marketable parts. Notions of privacy become eroded within this paradigm. Commodities don’t need privacy. People do.
It's essential to dispel the notion of "gender people" and recognize individuals as consumers caught up in a market driven by financial interests. The industry's proliferation signifies a broader societal deconstruction, reducing individuals to mere commodities devoid of inherent worth or boundaries. The ethical ramifications of this dehumanization cannot be understated. The dissolution of social cohesion is already creating chaos and the harm being meted out to children is unconscionable.
Many groups and organizations now forming in attempts to resist the harms of the gender industry, are using consumers of artificial sex characteristics as symbols of solidarity or understanding. They fail to acknowledge the diverse motivations behind these consumer choices. Individuals who opt for synthetic sex characteristics remain male or female, and any perceived transformation is a product of marketing rather than inherent change. By using consumers of artificial sex characteristics, as props, they bolster the industry and the illusion that these consumers are a type of person. I am not a new type of person if I purchase a Mercedes Benz. The same is true of people who consume synthetic sex characteristics. They are consumers of a product.
The synthetic sex industry is medical dehumanization. It is unethical in all its forms. The fact this must be argued, or that people have come to be afraid to offend anyone by saying so, tells us exactly how far the dehumanization of all of us, has already progressed.
In confronting the gender industry, it's imperative to dispel the illusion of a battle for human rights against a fabricated construct. Instead, we must recognize it as a manifestation of medical-technological commodification and work towards restoring the dignity, boundaries, and integrity of individuals within society.
This research depends on the generosity of readers like you. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.
