top of page

Let’s Have No More Talk of Dysphoria

Updated: Oct 15, 2022

The media is selling disembodiment as expression, for-profit and they are including free shipping.

In less than a decade, the “transgender” “human rights” “movement” (I am already running out of quotation marks), replete with their own NGOs, has morphed from "born in the wrong body" to “gender identity disorder,” to “gender dysphoria,” to “gender incongruence,” to “gender identity,” to “gender expression,” complete with lines of make-up, fashion and body scars.

Should it be a surprise there is now a contagion of young women wanting to have their healthy breasts amputated? Is it possible they are absorbing the messages that promote body dysphoria as progressive, cool, and edgy by media conglomerates selling this exact message?

The culture was primed for this contagion by the media, which we’re groomed to believe, in most western cultures, is a free and open source of information in democratic societies. Remember all those stories, seven years back, of poor children “born in the wrong body,” boys with a love of the color pink and hair ribbons meant to rip at our heartstrings? Stories of families with young children who like the stereotypical things of the opposite sex flooded the media, across western cultures, constantly with the same narrative: discovery of an unacceptable identity, initial anxiety within the child and the family, and then all of them eventually overcoming the disruption. The families realized it was another “normal” way to be human. Everyone lived happily ever after. Yea, right. The media coincidently forgot to mention all the medical risks and problems for the rest of the child's life. NO BIG DEAL.

Seven years later, we have an epidemic of young women and many young boys as well, threatening their parents with suicide if their parents do not agree to allow their children to take wrong sex hormones and have surgeries on their sex organs on demand. At the same time, medical professionals affirm children’s disordered thinking. Advertising is nothing if not insidious which is what makes it so effective.

On one front, we have Johnson & Johnson marketing these procedures as totally routine “cosmetic” surgeries, surgeons smiling into cameras at gender clinics, cheerleading the most macabre reengineering of healthy human sex organs (open that link at your own risk), reality TV shows and mainstream magazines celebrating the castration of young men.

Men are walking fashion runways in pregnancy prostheses, and young women are being displayed in underwear ad campaigns; their surgery scars from the amputation of healthy breasts being promoted as empowerment. Meanwhile, journalists, academics, and those engaged in politics and policy are all being censored for attempting to critique this by the same media. Is this supposed to be an organic development across countries and media platforms simultaneously?

Hollywood stars “parade their children” who like to wear the clothing associated with the opposite sex, as little accessories in their fashionable lives, for the media. Others are feeding Kool-Aid to young people from magazine spreads who want these surgeries too.

While the media inundates us with these messages, taxpayers are forced to fund operations through new health insurance policies for surgeries on young people's bodies that are not sick or injured. All the while, gender ideology activists and their NGOs supporting the construct of “synthetic sex medical expressions” are depathologizing this monstrosity and attempting to sell the public the idea that sex exists on a spectrum, that human sexual dimorphism is a construct and that expressing how you feel about yourself by having your sex organs surgically rearranged is progressive. Access to wrong sex hormones is being offered to students on university campuses without medical oversight or recommendation. At the same time, LGBT organizations, who fund the media in exchange for the press supporting gender industry delusions, scream, "human rights!!”

Media platforms are owned by massive corporate conglomerates which interface with the medical-industrial complex (MIC). People think they are reading Glamour, Vogue, Vanity Fair, Wired, and The New Yorker, when they are reading Conde’ Nast, a corporate conglomerate with a massive investment in the MIC and gender as a medical identity. Ditto for Cosmopolitan, Esquire, Bazar, Good Housekeeping, Oprah, Seventeen, Women’s Health, etc., which are part of the Hearst media conglomerate, with vast investments in the MIC and the gender industry. Ditto for those watching ABC, ESPN, and Touchstone Pictures (among hundreds of other media platforms) owned by Disney, yet another conglomerate with significant investments in the MIC, including the gender industry. Disney holds high prestige with the LGBT Human Rights Commission for their "diversity & inclusion" policies which are corporate-speak for homogeneity of thought, and have funded $100,000,000 to children's hospitals across the country, including Texas Children's Hospital and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, both of which have gender clinics. Pity, the children, caught in this corporate profiteering matrix. Meredith Corporation owns People Magazine (which covered the celebration of a young man's castration party), Parents, In Style, Health, Shape, and until about two minutes ago, owned Time Magazine (Let’s not forget their famous cover of Laverne Cox). Meredith, like any other media conglomerate, has its health platforms and investments in the MIC. Time Magazine (of recent Eliot Page fame) was purchased by billionaire ($57 billion), Marc Benioff in 2018. But don’t expect things to get any better for an allowable critique of the gender medical industry at Benioff’s new platform purchase because you’ll be out of luck fast. Benioff is all on board for the violation of privacy, safety, and rights of women and girls and is jumping in where Disney left off, bestowing a whopping $100.000,000. to another California children’s hospital. And oh, look, they just happen to have a youth gender clinic too!

There aren’t many media conglomerates feeding us information and it only fits within the allowable purview of their corporate interests. They are all on board the gender-as-medical-identity train, leading us to believe this uniformity of thought is organic acceptance by the populace which encourages group think acquiescence. In other words, people are being brainwashed into believing that disembodiment for profiteering is a human right and that most people agree with this - when most people don't know feck-all about what is happening because all they see are slick advertisements by the MIC-controlled media and messages from the LGBT NGO front which tell the media what to say. The mainstream media is being controlled and trained by LGBT NGOs fronting for the MIC and functioning as the arbiters of nothing less than reality itself.

We have to get clear that this apparatus of the gender medical industry is being strategically driven by capital, technological developments, and the MIC through all our institutions, corporations, and governments. While we are all arguing about what identity means, as it is overlaid with sex-role stereotypes, the elites are running away with human sex. They are violating the boundary between male and female, opening markets to which our essential humanity becomes a-sky-is the-limit market to be mined.

This research depends on the generosity of readers. If you like what you are reading on the 11th-hour blog, please consider a donation or paid subscription in support. Use this link for donations. Thank you.

Bình luận

Your donations make this research possible - Support the 11th Hour Blog!
PayPal ButtonPayPal Button
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon
bottom of page