Capturing the American Psychological Association: The Engineering of Human Sexual Evolution

“Transgenderism” is a eugenics project driven by Big Pharma, the state, and billionaires in order to engineer human sexual evolution. The lion’s share of reproduction will be given over to the techno-medical complex in the future and our sex will become obsolete.

Arcus Foundation (AF), the largest LGBTQ+ non-governmental organization in the world, was established by trained architect Jon Stryker, founding board member of Greenleaf Trust (a wealth management firm) and heir to the Stryker Medical fortune. Jon Stryker has built—with money from his medical riches—an interlocking web of support for engineering human sexual evolution, which drives the ideologies of “gender identity” and “transgenderismaround the world. These ideologies promote the normalization of body dissociation in the real world. They dissociate humans from their sexed reality and present it as another way to be human.

One of the institutions captured by AF is the American Psychological Association (APA), the leading scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States. The APA boasts more than 118,000 members and has received $650,000 in direct funding from AF. It’s not a huge leap to understand that Jon Stryker is poised to benefit from driving the ideology that he spreads, considering that its theories often lead to unnecessary drugs and surgeries that profit his medical corporation (in 2020 alone, 8,548 breast amputations were completed in the U.S., on young women’s and girls’ healthy breasts). There does, however, seem to be more to the story than mere profiteering. Why, after all, tie an ideology of disembodiment—one that promotes the idea that anyone can change their sex—to a human rights movement for embodied same-sex attraction?

In 2001, with the help of AF funding (pdf) the APA established INET (International Psychology Network for LGBTIQ, later called IPsyNet). Prior to its addition of “gender identity,” the APA INET focused on LGB issues (pdf). In 2005, the APA created the Task Force on Gender Identity and Gender Variance. In its 2009 report, the APA acknowledged the reasons and broad cultural contexts for the creation of this task force, highlighting three aspects (p. 9):

· Increased public awareness of “transgender” issues

· Decentralization of assessment and treatment for people with “gender identity” concerns

· The influence of community activism

Arcus Foundation helps to manifest these aspects by supplying hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to various institutions around the world—including the APA—to drive the ideology of “gender identity.” The purpose is to create a structure that organizes new terminology and new categories of humans based on an expanded definition of human sex, including people’s individual interpretations of their sex. “Gender identity” ideology allows for the opening of markets in identities based on sexual orientation and expressions, as it violates the physical boundary between male and female. So far, this violation is cosmetic only, a façade only made possible with modern technology, drugs and surgeries. With advances in medical technology—especially regarding genetic manipulations such as CRISPR—and the normalization of this breach, potentially greater encroachments to human sex, and humanity itself, loom large.

With the emergence of IPsyNet, psychologists were encouraged to "modify their understanding of 'gender,' broadening the range of variation viewed as healthy and normative." IPsyNet received a $300,000 grant from Arcus Foundation in 2015, which it used "to develop guidelines to assist psychologists (pdf) in the provision of what it deemed culturally competent, developmentally appropriate, and 'trans-affirmative' psychological practice with 'transgender' and 'gender nonconforming' people." What exactly happens when terms such as “gender,” “gender identity,” and “transgenderism” are conflated with each other and with biological sex, and then are rapidly driven into the cultural lexicon, the law, and the global market?

The APA “gender identity” task force report, in describing the new terminology for “gender identity” ideology, states that sex “refers to attributes that characterize biological maleness and femaleness” (p. 28). The report uncouples "gender" from sex, stating that "gender" “refers to the psychological, behavioral, or cultural characteristics associated with maleness and femaleness” (p. 28). The report continues: So-called "gender identity" refers to a person’s “basic sense of being male, female, or of indeterminate sex” (p. 28). This conflates sex with "gender." How does one feel like the female or male sex, or neither?